Measuring the flashbulb-like nature of memories for private events: the flashbulb memory checklist
- PMID: 29366357
- DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2018.1428348
Measuring the flashbulb-like nature of memories for private events: the flashbulb memory checklist
Abstract
What do we remember following an emotionally charged event? The assessment of memory characteristics for an emotional event represents one of the most challenging issues in the domain of autobiographical memory. Literature of flashbulb memories (FBMs) provides a crucial contribution on this issue: Following an emotional and unexpected public event, people remember not only central details of the episode, but also irrelevant, peripheral and idiosyncratic details of the reception context in which they learned of the news. The present study was set up to assess the factorial structure (samples 1 and 2) and convergent validity (sample 2) of an FBM checklist, an instrument designed to measure Flashbulb-like features of memories for emotional private events. Factorial analyses account for an oblique two-factor solution - FBM Specificity and Confidence - while correlational analyses support the convergent validity of this instrument. Practical implications are discussed, especially for the credibility assessment of witnesses of emotional events in forensic settings.
Keywords: Flashbulb memory; confidence; private events; specificity.
Similar articles
-
The emotional and reconstructive determinants of emotional memories: an experimental approach to flashbulb memory investigation.Memory. 2010 Jul;18(5):473-85. doi: 10.1080/09658211003762076. Epub 2010 Apr 21. Memory. 2010. PMID: 20419556
-
Type or dimension? A taxometric investigation of flashbulb memories.Memory. 2012;20(2):177-88. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2011.651088. Memory. 2012. PMID: 22313420
-
Michael Jackson, Bin Laden and I: functions of positive and negative, public and private flashbulb memories.Memory. 2015;23(4):487-506. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.907428. Epub 2014 Apr 23. Memory. 2015. PMID: 24758437
-
Towards a better integration of emotional factors in autobiographical memory.Memory. 2022 Jan;30(1):49-54. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1896738. Epub 2021 Mar 12. Memory. 2022. PMID: 33706669 Review.
-
Why autobiographical memories for traumatic and emotional events might differ: theoretical arguments and empirical evidence.J Psychol. 2014 Sep-Oct;148(5):523-47. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2013.814619. J Psychol. 2014. PMID: 25087317 Review.
Cited by
-
Swipes and Saves: A Taxonomy of Factors Influencing Aesthetic Assessments and Perceived Beauty of Mobile Phone Photographs.Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 28;13:786977. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.786977. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35295400 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Flashbulb memories for the declaration of the COVID-19 alarm state: Age-related differences.Psychol Res. 2025 Jun 5;89(3):109. doi: 10.1007/s00426-025-02140-1. Psychol Res. 2025. PMID: 40471356 Free PMC article.
-
A study on the use of Flashbulb Memories features to discriminate true from fabricated autobiographical memories for negative events.Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 15;15(1):25599. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10640-8. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40664886 Free PMC article.
-
Flashbulb Memories in the Communication of the Diagnosis of Visual Impairment: The Effect of Context and Content.Children (Basel). 2023 May 14;10(5):881. doi: 10.3390/children10050881. Children (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37238429 Free PMC article.
-
Flashbulb memories in the context of group hierarchies: effects of gender, system justification, and social dominance orientation on negative private and public flashbulb memories.Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 27;15:1488241. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1488241. eCollection 2024. Front Psychol. 2024. PMID: 39664638 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources