Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep;216(3):630-635.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

Self-assessment of team performance using T-NOTECHS in simulated pediatric trauma resuscitation is not consistent with expert assessment

Affiliations

Self-assessment of team performance using T-NOTECHS in simulated pediatric trauma resuscitation is not consistent with expert assessment

Minna M Wieck et al. Am J Surg. 2018 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The Trauma NOn-TECHnical Skills (T-NOTECHS) tool has been used to assess teamwork in trauma resuscitation, but its reliability and validity for self-assessment is unknown. Our purpose was to determine the reliability and validity of self-administered T-NOTECHS in pediatric trauma resuscitation.

Methods: Simulated in situ resuscitations were evaluated using T-NOTECHS in real time by experts and immediately afterwards by team members. Reliability was analyzed with linear-weighted kappa and intra-class correlation. T-NOTECHS scores were compared between expert (gold-standard) and self-assessment.

Results: Fifteen simulations were examined. T-NOTECHS scores were similar between self- and expert assessment for leadership. Self-assessment scores were higher than expert for the other domains and total composite score. Inter-rater reliability for total score was similar between the two groups, but differences were observed in the domains.

Conclusions: Self-assessment is not interchangeable with expert rating when using T-NOTECHS. Future studies need to determine how self-assessment can be best utilized.

Level of evidence: Studies of diagnostic accuracy - Level 2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Scatterplot of mean scores comparing expert and team self-assessment for each of the five T-NOTECHS domains and total composite score (N=15 teams assessed). Error bars represent standard error for expert raters (vertical) and team member self-assessment (horizontal).

References

    1. Kohn L. To err is human: an interview with the Institute of Medicine’s Linda Kohn. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2000;26(4):227–34. - PubMed
    1. Gawande AA, Zinner MJ, Studdert DM, Brennan TA. Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals. Surgery 2003;133(6):614–21. - PubMed
    1. Scott DJ, Dunnington GL. The new ACS/APDS Skills Curriculum: moving the learning curve out of the operating room. J Gastrointest Surg 2008;12(2):213–21. - PubMed
    1. Knudson MM, Khaw L, Bullard MK, et al. Trauma training in simulation: translating skills from SIM time to real time. J Trauma 2008;64(2):255–63; discussion 63–4. - PubMed
    1. Holcomb JB, Dumire RD, Crommett JW, et al. Evaluation of trauma team performance using an advanced human patient simulator for resuscitation training. J Trauma 2002;52(6):1078–85; discussion 85–6. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources