Comparisons of visual attention in school-age children with cochlear implants versus hearing peers and normative data
- PMID: 29370963
- PMCID: PMC5809287
- DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.01.002
Comparisons of visual attention in school-age children with cochlear implants versus hearing peers and normative data
Abstract
Objective: Previous research has found that preschoolers with hearing loss have worse visual attention and elevated rates of behavior problems when compared to typically hearing peers (Barker et al., 2009). However, little is known about these deficits in school-age children with cochlear implants (CIs). We evaluated visual selective attention in school-age children with CIs and hearing peers and examined the link between visual attention and behavior problems.
Method: Data were drawn from the Childhood Development after Cochlear Implantation (CDaCI) study, the largest longitudinal, multi-site study of children with CIs. Visual attention was measured using d prime (d') on a continuous performance test (The Gordon CPT), which requires participants to watch a stream of digits and hit a button after seeing a certain target (a 9 following a 1). The CPT captures the probability of a hit (pressing button for a target) vs a false alarm (pressing the button for a non-target) while accounting for chance responding. In addition, predictors of visual attention, including IQ (using Processing Speed and Perceptional Reasoning on the WISC-IV), age at implantation, gender, and device management were examined. Externalizing problems were assessed using parent-report on the BASC-2. Data were drawn from 60 months post-implantation.
Results: Children with CIs (n = 106) showed significantly worse visual selective attention than hearing peers. The difference in d' was driven by higher rates of false alarms. In the CI group, the Processing Speed Index on the WISC was correlated with total omissions, total commissions and d'. Within the CI group, d' significantly predicted parent-reported externalizing behavior problems. This finding was primarily driven by elevated Hyperactivity in the CI group.
Conclusion: Children with CIs continue to display deficits in visual attention when compared to their hearing peers. Despite improvements in oral language, these problems have critical implications for academic performance and social competence. Currently, cochlear implant teams do not focus on these other dimensions of development and thus, may not be positioned to address them. Assessment of attention and behavior should be incorporated into routine, annual visits soon after implant surgery, and remediation of these deficits should be included in early intervention programs.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Psychosocial Development in 5-Year-Old Children With Hearing Loss Using Hearing Aids or Cochlear Implants.Trends Hear. 2017 Jan-Dec;21:2331216517710373. doi: 10.1177/2331216517710373. Trends Hear. 2017. PMID: 28752809 Free PMC article.
-
Spoken language and everyday functioning in 5-year-old children using hearing aids or cochlear implants.Int J Audiol. 2018 May;57(sup2):S55-S69. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1370140. Epub 2017 Sep 12. Int J Audiol. 2018. PMID: 28899200 Free PMC article.
-
Factors influencing speech perception in noise for 5-year-old children using hearing aids or cochlear implants.Int J Audiol. 2018 May;57(sup2):S70-S80. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1346307. Epub 2017 Jul 7. Int J Audiol. 2018. PMID: 28687057 Free PMC article.
-
What can we expect of normally-developing children implanted at a young age with respect to their auditory, linguistic and cognitive skills?Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:171-9. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Sep 16. Hear Res. 2015. PMID: 25219955 Review.
-
The MMN as a viable and objective marker of auditory development in CI users.Hear Res. 2017 Sep;353:57-75. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.07.007. Epub 2017 Jul 20. Hear Res. 2017. PMID: 28800468 Review.
Cited by
-
Differential At-Risk Pediatric Outcomes of Parental Sensitivity Based on Hearing Status.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Sep 14;64(9):3668-3684. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00491. Epub 2021 Aug 31. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021. PMID: 34463547 Free PMC article.
-
Auditory and Visual Response Inhibition in Children with Bilateral Hearing Aids and Children with ADHD.Brain Sci. 2020 May 18;10(5):307. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10050307. Brain Sci. 2020. PMID: 32443468 Free PMC article.
-
Vocabulary Composition Shapes Language Development in Children With Cochlear Implants.Dev Sci. 2025 Jan;28(1):e13588. doi: 10.1111/desc.13588. Dev Sci. 2025. PMID: 39506283
-
The Input Matters: Assessing Cumulative Language Access in Deaf and Hard of Hearing Individuals and Populations.Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 19;11:1407. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01407. eCollection 2020. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32636790 Free PMC article.
-
Deaf Children of Hearing Parents Have Age-Level Vocabulary Growth When Exposed to American Sign Language by 6 Months of Age.J Pediatr. 2021 May;232:229-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.01.029. Epub 2021 Jan 19. J Pediatr. 2021. PMID: 33482219 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abidin RR. Parenting Stress Index-Manual. 3. Charlottesville, VA: Pediatric Psychology Press; 1990.
-
- Achenbach TM, Edelbrock CS. Manual for the Child Behaviorr Checklist and Revised Child Behavior Profile. Burlington, Vermont: University of Vermont, Department of Psychology; 1983.
-
- Barkley RA. Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin. 1997;121(1):65–94. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical