Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab 0.5 mg for the Treatment of Macular Edema Resulting from Uncommon Causes: Twelve-Month Findings from PROMETHEUS
- PMID: 29371007
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.12.002
Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab 0.5 mg for the Treatment of Macular Edema Resulting from Uncommon Causes: Twelve-Month Findings from PROMETHEUS
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab 0.5 mg in adult patients with macular edema (ME) resulting from any cause other than diabetes, retinal vein occlusion, or neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
Design: A phase 3, 12-month, double-masked, randomized, sham-controlled, multicenter study.
Participants: One hundred seventy-eight eligible patients aged ≥18 years.
Methods: Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either ranibizumab 0.5 mg (n = 118) or sham (n = 60) at baseline and month 1. From month 2, patients in both arms received open-label individualized ranibizumab treatment based on disease activity. A preplanned subgroup analysis was conducted on the primary end point on 5 predefined baseline ME etiologies (inflammatory/post-uveitis, pseudophakic or aphakic, central serous chorioretinopathy, idiopathic, and miscellaneous).
Main outcome measures: Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters) from baseline to month 2 (primary end point) and month 12 and safety over 12 months.
Results: Overall, 156 patients (87.6%) completed the study. The baseline characteristics were well balanced between the treatment arms. Overall, ranibizumab showed superior efficacy versus sham from baseline to month 2 (least squares mean BCVA, +5.7 letters vs. +2.9 letters; 1-sided P = 0.0111), that is, a treatment effect (TE) of +2.8 letters. The mean BCVA gain from baseline to month 12 was 9.6 letters with ranibizumab. The TE at month 2 was variable in the 5 predefined etiology subgroups, ranging from >5-letter gain to 0.5-letter loss. The safety findings were consistent with the well-established safety profile of ranibizumab.
Conclusions: The primary end point was met and ranibizumab showed superiority in BCVA gain over sham in treating ME due to uncommon causes, with a TE of +2.8 letters versus sham at month 2. At month 12, the mean BCVA gain was high (9.6 letters) in the ranibizumab arm; however, the TE was observed to be variable across the different etiology subgroups, reaching a >1-line TE in BCVA in patients with ME resulting from inflammatory conditions/post-uveitis or after cataract surgery. Overall, ranibizumab was well tolerated with no new safety findings up to month 12.
Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Reply.Ophthalmology. 2019 Jun;126(6):e43-e44. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.12.021. Ophthalmology. 2019. PMID: 31122367 No abstract available.
-
Re: Staurenghi et al.: Efficacy and safety of ranibizumab 0.5 mg for the treatment of macular edema resulting from uncommon causes: twelve-month findings from PROMETHEUS (Ophthalmology. 2018;125:850-862).Ophthalmology. 2019 Jun;126(6):e43. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.12.020. Ophthalmology. 2019. PMID: 31122368 No abstract available.
-
Re: Staurenghi et al.: Efficacy and safety of ranibizumab 0.5 mg for the treatment of macular edema resulting from uncommon causes: twelve-month findings from PROMETHEUS (Ophthalmology. 2018;125:850-862).Ophthalmology. 2019 Jun;126(6):e44-e45. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.12.018. Ophthalmology. 2019. PMID: 31122369 No abstract available.
-
Reply.Ophthalmology. 2019 Jun;126(6):e45-e46. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.12.019. Ophthalmology. 2019. PMID: 31122370 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous