Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 15:4:33.
doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0226-8. eCollection 2018.

A randomised feasibility study to investigate the impact of education and the addition of prompts on the sedentary behaviour of office workers

Catriona O'Dolan  1 , Margaret Grant  1 , Maggie Lawrence  1 , Philippa Dall  1
Affiliations

A randomised feasibility study to investigate the impact of education and the addition of prompts on the sedentary behaviour of office workers

Catriona O'Dolan et al. Pilot Feasibility Stud. .

Abstract

Background: Office workers have been identified as being at risk of accumulating high amounts of sedentary time in prolonged events during work hours, which has been associated with increased risk of a number of long-term health conditions.There is some evidence that providing advice to stand at regular intervals during the working day, and using computer-based prompts, can reduce sedentary behaviour in office workers. However, evidence of effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability for these types of intervention is currently limited.

Methods: A 2-arm, parallel group, cluster-randomised feasibility trial to assess the acceptability of prompts to break up sedentary behaviour was conducted with office workers in a commercial bank (n = 21). Participants were assigned to an education only group (EG) or prompt and education group (PG). Both groups received education on reducing and breaking up sitting at work, and the PG also received hourly prompts, delivered by Microsoft Outlook over 10 weeks, reminding them to stand. Objective measurements of sedentary behaviour were made using activPAL monitors worn at three time points: baseline, in the last 2 weeks of the intervention period and 12 weeks after the intervention. Focus groups were conducted to explore the acceptability of the intervention and the motivations and barriers to changing sedentary behaviour.

Results: Randomly generated, customised prompts, delivered by Microsoft Outlook, with messages about breaking up sitting, proved to be a feasible and acceptable way of delivering prompts to office workers. Participants in both groups reduced their sitting, but changes were not maintained at follow-up. The education session seemed to increase outcome expectations of the benefits of changing sedentary behaviour and promote self-regulation of behaviour in some participants. However, low self-efficacy and a desire to conform to cultural norms were barriers to changing behaviour.

Conclusions: Prompts delivered by Microsoft Outlook were a feasible, low-cost way of prompting office workers to break up their sedentary behaviour, although further research is needed to determine whether this has an additional impact on sedentary behaviour, to education alone. The role of cultural norms, and promoting self-efficacy, should be considered in the design of future interventions.

Trial registration: This study was registered retrospectively as a clinical trial on ClinicalTrials.gov (ID no. NCT02609282) on 23 March 2015.

Keywords: Office; Prompts; Sedentary behaviour; Social cognitive theory; Workplace.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethical approval was granted by Glasgow Caledonian University School of Health & Life Sciences Ethics Committee (reference HLS/Psy/A14/083). All participants signed consent to participate and for their anonymised data to be used in publication.Not applicable.The authors declare that they have no competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Adapted CONSORT flow diagram illustrating participant retention [41]
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Chau JY, Grunseit AC, Chey T, Stamatakis E, Brown WJ, Matthews CE, Bauman AE, van der Ploeg HP. Daily sitting time and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e80000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080000. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Proper KI, Singh AS, Mechelen VW, Chin A, MJM P. Sedentary behaviors and health outcomes among adults a systematic review of prospective studies. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(2):174–182. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thorp AA, Owen N, Neuhaus M, Dunstan DW. Sedentary behaviors and subsequent health outcomes in adults. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(2):207–215. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.05.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. LFM DR, Rodrigues Lopes M, Rey-López JP, VKR M, Luiz Odo C. Sedentary behavior and health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e105620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105620. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chastin SFM, Mandrichenko O, Helbostadt JL, Skelton DA. Associations between objectively-measured sedentary behaviour and physical activity with bone mineral density in adults and older adults, the NHANES study. Bone. 2014;64:254–262. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.04.009. - DOI - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources