Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May;194(5):386-391.
doi: 10.1007/s00066-018-1265-7. Epub 2018 Jan 25.

Patient positioning in head and neck cancer : Setup variations and safety margins in helical tomotherapy

Affiliations

Patient positioning in head and neck cancer : Setup variations and safety margins in helical tomotherapy

Christina Leitzen et al. Strahlenther Onkol. 2018 May.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the interfractional variations of patient positioning during intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with helical tomotherapy in head and neck cancer and to calculate the required safety margins (sm) for bony landmarks resulting from the necessary table adjustments.

Materials and methods: In all, 15 patients with head and neck cancer were irradiated using the Hi-Art II tomotherapy system between April and September 2016. Before therapy sessions, patient position was frequently checked by megavolt computed tomography (MV-CT). Necessary table adjustments (ta) in the right-left (rl), superior-inferior (si) and anterior-posterior (ap) directions were recorded for four anatomical points: second, fourth and sixth cervical vertebral body (CVB), anterior nasal spine (ANS). Based upon these data sm were calculated for non-image-guided radiotherapy, image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and image guidance limited to a shortened area (CVB 2).

Results: Based upon planning CT the actual treatment required ta from -0.05 ± 1.31 mm for CVB 2 (ap) up to 2.63 ± 2.39 mm for ANS (rl). Considering the performed ta resulting from image control (MV-CT) we detected remaining ta from -0.10 ± 1.09 mm for CVB 4 (rl) up to 1.97 ± 1.64 mm for ANS (si). After theoretical adjustment of patients position to CVB 2 the resulting ta ranged from -0.11 ± 2.44 mm for CVB6 (ap) to 2.37 ± 2.17 mm for ANS (si). These data imply safety margins: uncorrected patient position: 3.63-9.95 mm, corrected positioning based upon the whole target volume (IGRT): 1.85-6.63 mm, corrected positioning based upon CVB 2 (IGRT): 3.13-6.66 mm.

Conclusions: The calculated safety margins differ between anatomic regions. Repetitive and frequent image control of patient positioning is necessary that, however, possibly may be focussed on a limited region.

Keywords: Head and neck cancer; IMRT; Safety margin; Tomotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Radiat Oncol J. 2012 Mar;30(1):36-42 - PubMed
    1. Onco Targets Ther. 2015 Sep 14;8:2545-53 - PubMed
    1. Strahlenther Onkol. 2016 Aug;192(8):516-25 - PubMed
    1. Radiol Oncol. 2016 Sep 8;50(4):427-432 - PubMed
    1. Radiother Oncol. 2003 Mar;66(3):303-11 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources