Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Apr;47(2):161-170.
doi: 10.1007/s13744-018-0589-4. Epub 2018 Jan 25.

Problems Inherent to Augmentation of Natural Enemies in Open Agriculture

Affiliations
Review

Problems Inherent to Augmentation of Natural Enemies in Open Agriculture

J P Michaud. Neotrop Entomol. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Augmentation biological control has successfully replaced a lot of insecticide use in 'closed system' agriculture (e.g., greenhouses). The profitable commercialization of biocontrol agents in greenhouses has created an incentive to expand markets for mass-reared beneficial insects into open agricultural systems, often without sufficient scientific justification. However, the semi-contained nature of greenhouse culture is often critical to the success of augmentation and can serve to mask potential pitfalls and intrinsic limitations of this approach in open systems. Factors contributing to greenhouse successes include the reduced biological diversity of contained agroecosystems, the prevention of agent dispersal, the ability to maintain environmental conditions within a range favorable for the agent, the exclusion of competitors and natural enemies of the agent that might otherwise diminish its efficacy, and the absence of alternative prey/hosts that could divert predation/parasitism from the target pest. There are also problems arising from collection of source material from locally adapted populations, and the inadvertent imposition of artificial selection in the course of laboratory rearing. Besides highlighting these pitfalls, this paper aims to encourage more consideration of conservation approaches prior to investment in augmentation programs which entice farmers into perpetual cycles of 'rear and release.' I argue that although augmentation can benefit agriculture whenever it replaces pesticide applications, it does not constitute an ecologically sustainable solution because it requires continued inputs, and it can distract research attention away from more sustainable objectives. Sustainable biological control is best achieved through modifications to cultural practices that increasingly 'naturalize' agroecosystems, thus facilitating the natural recruitment and persistence of beneficial arthropod fauna, combined with habitat management geared to increasing overall plant and arthropod diversity in the agroecosystem.

Keywords: Conservation biological control; ecological pest management; habitat manipulation; parasitoids; predators; sustainable agriculture.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Econ Entomol. 2016 Dec 1;109 (6):2272-2280 - PubMed
    1. Chemosphere. 2016 Sep;159:1-9 - PubMed
    1. Insects. 2012 Dec 21;4(1):55-70 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 2010 Jul 1;466(7302):109-12 - PubMed
    1. PeerJ. 2017 Dec 19;5:e4179 - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources