Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Feb;53(2):160-167.
doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-386-16. Epub 2018 Jan 26.

Comparison of Compressive Myofascial Release and the Graston Technique for Improving Ankle-Dorsiflexion Range of Motion

Justin Stanek  1 , Taylor Sullivan  2 , Samantha Davis  1
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of Compressive Myofascial Release and the Graston Technique for Improving Ankle-Dorsiflexion Range of Motion

Justin Stanek et al. J Athl Train. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Context: Restricted dorsiflexion (DF) at the ankle joint can cause acute and chronic injuries at the ankle and knee. Myofascial release and instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) techniques have been used to increase range of motion (ROM); however, evidence directly comparing their effectiveness is limited.

Objective: To compare the effects of a single session of compressive myofascial release (CMR) or IASTM using the Graston Technique (GT) on closed chain ankle-DF ROM.

Design: Randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Laboratory.

Patients or other participants: Participants were 44 physically active people (53 limbs) with less than 30° of DF.

Intervention(s): Limbs were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: control, CMR, or GT. Both treatment groups received one 5-minute treatment that included scanning the area and treating specific restrictions. The control group sat for 5 minutes before measurements were retaken.

Main outcome measure(s): Standing and kneeling ankle DF were measured before and immediately after treatment. Change scores were calculated for both positions, and two 1-way analyses of variance were conducted.

Results: A difference between groups was found in the standing ( F2,52 = 13.78, P = .001) and kneeling ( F2,52 = 5.85, P = .01) positions. Post hoc testing showed DF improvements in the standing position after CMR compared with the GT and control groups (both P = .001). In the kneeling position, DF improved after CMR compared with the control group ( P = .005).

Conclusions: Compressive myofascial release increased ankle DF after a single treatment in participants with DF ROM deficits. Clinicians should consider adding CMR as a treatment intervention for patients with DF deficits.

Keywords: manual therapy; muscle tightness; soft tissue mobilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Standing weight-bearing dorsiflexion range of motion. A, Starting and, B, ending positions.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kneeling weight-bearing dorsiflexion range of motion. A, Starting and, B, ending positions.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Compressive myofascial release technique.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Graston Technique (Graston Technique, LLC, Indianapolis, IN).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Change in standing dorsiflexion by participant and group. A, Control group. B, Compressive myofascial release group. C, Graston Technique group.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Change in kneeling dorsiflexion by participant and group. A, Control group. B, Compressive myofascial release group. C, Graston Technique group.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

  • Letter to the Editor.
    Ploski M, Schrader JW. Ploski M, et al. J Athl Train. 2018 Jul;53(7):633-634. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-53-01. J Athl Train. 2018. PMID: 30192677 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. You JY, Lee HM, Luo HJ, Lee CC, Cheng PG, Wu SK. . Gastrocnemius tightness on joint angle and work of lower extremity during gait. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009; 24 9: 744– 750. - PubMed
    1. Willems TM, Witvrouw E, Delbaere K, De Bourdeaudhuij I, De Clercq D. . Intrinsic risk factors for inversion ankle sprains in male subjects: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2005; 33 3: 415– 423. - PubMed
    1. Denegar CR, Miller SJ III.. Can chronic ankle instability be prevented? Rethinking management of lateral ankle sprains. J Athl Train. 2002; 37 4: 430– 435. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hertel J. . Functional anatomy, pathomechanics, and pathophysiology of lateral ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2002; 37 4: 364– 375. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reid A, Birmingham T, Alcock G. . Efficacy of mobilization with movement for patients with limited dorsiflexion after ankle sprain: a crossover trial. Physiother Can. 2007; 59 3: 166– 172.

Publication types