Competing Flow Between Partial Circulatory Support and Native Cardiac Output: A Clinical Computational Fluid Dynamics Study
- PMID: 29373336
- DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000701
Competing Flow Between Partial Circulatory Support and Native Cardiac Output: A Clinical Computational Fluid Dynamics Study
Abstract
Partial circulatory support is a promising concept for the treatment of heart failure patients. A better understanding of induced hemodynamic changes is essential for optimizing treatment efficacy. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is an alternative method to gain insight into flow phenomena difficult to obtain in vivo. In 10 patients implanted with a Circulite Synergy Micro-pump (HeartWare, Framingham, Massachusetts) (a continuous flow partial circulatory assist device connecting the left atrium to the right subclavian artery), transient CFD simulations were performed. Patients were divided into two groups depending on their cardiac output (CO; high CO group: 5.5 ± 1.1 L/min, low CO group: 1.7 ± 0.7 L/min). The partial assist device provided a supporting flow of 1.5 ± 0.8 L/min. Support was highest at diastole and decreased during systole because of a collision of the blood flows from the partial assist device and the CO. Reversed flow counteracting the flow of the device was significantly higher for the high CO group (mean flow in peak systole: -2.18 ± 1.08 vs. 0.23 ± 0.59 L/min; p = 0.002) showing an inverse correlation between CO and amount of reversed flow during peak systole (R = -0.7; p < 0.02). The flow collision lead to higher total pressures at the point of collision and consequently in the Circulite outflow graft. The CFD simulations allow quantifying hemodynamic alterations in patients with partial support consisting of a flow collision, thereby reducing effectiveness of the circulatory support. Partial support in heart failure patients alternates their hemodynamics not only in providing support for the circulation but also inducing unfavorable changes in flow patterns.
Similar articles
-
Clinical benefits of partial circulatory support in New York Heart Association Class IIIB and Early Class IV patients.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 May;39(5):693-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.07.049. Epub 2010 Oct 8. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011. PMID: 20934882 Clinical Trial.
-
Proof of concept: hemodynamic response to long-term partial ventricular support with the synergy pocket micro-pump.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jun 30;54(1):79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.023. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 19555845
-
Hemodynamic effects of partial ventricular support in chronic heart failure: results of simulation validated with in vivo data.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Jan;133(1):21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.07.037. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007. PMID: 17198776
-
Does CircuLite Synergy assist device as partial ventricular support have a place in modern management of advanced heart failure?Expert Rev Med Devices. 2015 Jan;12(1):49-60. doi: 10.1586/17434440.2015.985208. Epub 2014 Dec 2. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2015. PMID: 25454250 Review.
-
Review of recent results using computational fluid dynamics simulations in patients receiving mechanical assist devices for end-stage heart failure.Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2014 Jul-Sep;10(3):185-9. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-10-3-185. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2014. PMID: 25574347 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Post-operative of bleeding, haemolysis and coagulation in mechanical circulatory support patients.Ann Transl Med. 2020 Jul;8(13):832. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-405. Ann Transl Med. 2020. PMID: 32793677 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous