Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 26;8(1):1687.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20071-3.

Increased Exposure of Tacrolimus by Co-administered Mycophenolate Mofetil: Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis in Healthy Volunteers

Affiliations

Increased Exposure of Tacrolimus by Co-administered Mycophenolate Mofetil: Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis in Healthy Volunteers

Jae Hyun Kim et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The objective of the study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions between tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in healthy Korean male volunteers. Seventeen volunteers participated in a three-period, single-dose, and fixed sequence study. They sequentially received MMF, TAC, and the combination. Concentrations of TAC, mycophenolic acid (MPA), and its metabolites MPA 7-O-glucuronide and MPA acyl glucuronide were measured. The variants of CYP3A4, CYP3A5, SLCO1B1, SLCO1B3, ABCC2, UGT1A9, and UGT2B7 were genotyped. Drug interaction was evaluated with a non-compartmental analysis and population pharmacokinetic modelling to quantify the interaction effect. A total of 1,082 concentrations of those analytes were analysed. AUC0-inf of TAC increased by 22.1% (322.4 ± 174.1 to 393.6 ± 121.7 ng·h/mL; P < 0.05) when co-administered with MMF, whereas the pharmacokinetic parameters of MPA and its metabolites were not changed by TAC. Apparent clearance (CL/F) of TAC was 17.8 L/h [relative standard error (RSE) 11%] or 13.8 L/h (RSE 11%) without or with MMF, respectively. Interaction was explained by the exponential model. The CYP3A5 genotype was the only significant covariate. The population estimate of CL/F of TAC was 1.48-fold (RSE 16%) in CYP3A5 expressers when compared to nonexpressers. CL/F of TAC was decreased when co-administered with MMF in these subjects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic presentation of an integrated population pharmacokinetic model. Compartments: gastrointestinal tract (GI, 1, 4), central compartment for tacrolimus (2); peripheral compartment for tacrolimus (3), central compartment for mycophenolic acid (5), peripheral compartment for mycophenolic acid (6), compartment for mycophenolic acid 7-O-glucuronide (7), compartment for gallbladder (8), compartment for mycophenolic acid acyl glucuronide (9). TAC, tacrolimus; Ka, absorption rate constant; k23, k32, k56, and k65, intercompartment rate constants; CL, clearance; MPA, mycophenolic acid; MPAG, MPA 7-O-glucuronide; AcMPAG, MPA acyl glucuronide; k57 and k59, metabolized rate constants for mycophenolic acid; EHC, enterohepatic circulation; k78, biliary recirculation of MPAG into GI; k70 and k90, eliminated rate constants; k84, gallbladder emptying rate constant; Meal times were used to trigger timing of gallbladder emptying.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Visual predictive check of integrated population pharmacokinetic models. (a) TAC; (b) MPA; (c) MPAG; (d) AcMPAG. Closed circles represent observed concentrations. Solid line represents median of observed concentration and dotted line represents 5th and 95th percentile of observed concentration. Light grey area represents 95% confidence interval of 5th and 95th percentile of predicted concentration and dark grey area, 95% confidence interval of median of predicted concentration. TAC, tacrolimus; MPA, mycophenolic acid; MPAG, MPA 7-O-glucuronide; AcMPAG, MPA acyl glucuronide.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Samaniego M, Becker BN, Djamali A. Drug insight: maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol. 2006;2:688–699. doi: 10.1038/ncpneph0343. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shapiro R, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of tacrolimus/prednisone versus tacrolimus/prednisone/mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1999;67:411–415. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199902150-00012. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johnson C, et al. Randomized trial of tacrolimus (Prograf) in combination with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (Neoral) with mycophenolate mofetil after cadaveric kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 2000;69:834–841. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200003150-00028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ojo AO, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil reduces late renal allograft loss independent of acute rejection. Transplantation. 2000;69:2405–2409. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200006150-00033. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Transplant Work, G. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant9Suppl 3, S1–155 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02834.x (2009). - PubMed

Publication types