The challenges of interventions to promote healthier food in independent takeaways in England: qualitative study of intervention deliverers' views
- PMID: 29374480
- PMCID: PMC5787327
- DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5096-3
The challenges of interventions to promote healthier food in independent takeaways in England: qualitative study of intervention deliverers' views
Abstract
Background: Much of the food available from takeaways, pubs and restaurants particularly that sold by independent outlets, is unhealthy and its consumption is increasing. These food outlets are therefore important potential targets for interventions to improve diet and thus prevent diet related chronic diseases. Local authorities in England have been charged with delivering interventions to increase the provision of healthy food choices in independent outlets, but prior research shows that few such interventions have been rigorously developed or evaluated. We aimed to learn from the experiences of professionals delivering interventions in independent food outlets in England to identify the operational challenges and their suggestions for best practice.
Methods: We used one-to-one semi-structured qualitative interviews to explore the views and experiences of professionals who were either employees of, or contracted by, a local authority to deliver interventions to increase the provision of healthier food choices in independent food outlets. Purposive sampling was used to recruit a sample which included men and women, from a range of professional roles, across different areas of England. Interviews were informed by a topic guide, and proceeded until no new themes emerged. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the Framework method.
Results: We conducted 11 individual interviews. Participants focussed on independent takeaways and their unhealthy food offerings, and highlighted the advantages and disadvantages of intervention delivery methods, their evaluation and impact. The main barriers to implementation of interventions in independent takeaways were identified as limited funding and the difficulties of engaging the food outlet owner/manager. Engagement was thought to be facilitated by delivering intensive, interactive and tailored interventions, clear and specific information, and incentives, whilst accounting for practical, primarily financial, constraints of food businesses. Alternative intervention approaches, targeting suppliers or customers, were suggested.
Conclusions: Participants emphasised independent takeaways as particularly challenging, but worthwhile intervention targets. Participants perceived that interventions need to take account of the potentially challenging operating environment, particularly the primacy of the profit motive. Upstream interventions, engaging suppliers, as well as those that drive consumer demand, may be worth exploring. Rigorous, evidence-informed development and evaluation of such interventions is needed.
Keywords: Diet; Food environments; Food outlets; Health promotion; Intervention; Public health nutrition; Qualitative methods; Takeaways.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
We obtained ethical approval for the study from the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medical Sciences at Newcastle University (Application No: 00761/2014). All participants gave written informed consent to take part and no financial or other incentives were offered.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
MW is funded by NIHR as Director of its Public Health Research Funding Programme. Authors LG, LP, JA, VAS, CDS, CA, AA, and AAL declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Barriers and facilitators to implementing a healthier food outlet initiative: perspectives from local governments.Public Health Nutr. 2021 Jun;24(9):2758-2770. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020002323. Epub 2020 Sep 8. Public Health Nutr. 2021. PMID: 32895071 Free PMC article.
-
Healthy eating interventions conducted in small, local restaurants and hot food takeaways: a systematic review.Public Health Nutr. 2025 Jan 9;28(1):e24. doi: 10.1017/S1368980025000035. Public Health Nutr. 2025. PMID: 39783012 Free PMC article.
-
A description of interventions promoting healthier ready-to-eat meals (to eat in, to take away, or to be delivered) sold by specific food outlets in England: a systematic mapping and evidence synthesis.BMC Public Health. 2017 Jan 19;17(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3980-2. BMC Public Health. 2017. PMID: 28103846 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The adoption and implementation of local government planning policy to manage hot food takeaways near schools in England: A qualitative process evaluation.Soc Sci Med. 2024 Dec;362:117431. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117431. Epub 2024 Oct 20. Soc Sci Med. 2024. PMID: 39447381
-
"It does help but there's a limit …": Young people's perspectives on policies to manage hot food takeaways opening near schools.Soc Sci Med. 2025 Mar;368:117810. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117810. Epub 2025 Feb 5. Soc Sci Med. 2025. PMID: 39929025
Cited by
-
The impact of school exclusion zone planning guidance on the number and type of food outlets in an English local authority: A longitudinal analysis.Health Place. 2021 Jul;70:102600. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102600. Epub 2021 Jun 9. Health Place. 2021. PMID: 34118573 Free PMC article.
-
Supporting a Healthier Takeaway Meal Choice: Creating a Universal Health Rating for Online Takeaway Fast-Food Outlets.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 11;17(24):9260. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249260. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 33322286 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and facilitators to implementing a healthier food outlet initiative: perspectives from local governments.Public Health Nutr. 2021 Jun;24(9):2758-2770. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020002323. Epub 2020 Sep 8. Public Health Nutr. 2021. PMID: 32895071 Free PMC article.
-
Healthy eating interventions conducted in small, local restaurants and hot food takeaways: a systematic review.Public Health Nutr. 2025 Jan 9;28(1):e24. doi: 10.1017/S1368980025000035. Public Health Nutr. 2025. PMID: 39783012 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of Fast-Food Consumption in Romania: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior.Foods. 2021 Aug 13;10(8):1877. doi: 10.3390/foods10081877. Foods. 2021. PMID: 34441653 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cullen P. Time, tastes and technology: the economic evolution of eating out. Br Food J. 1994;96:4–9. doi: 10.1108/00070709410072445. - DOI
-
- Hawkes C. Globalization, diets and noncommunicable diseases. 2002. Marketing activities of global soft drink and fast food companies in emerging markets: a review; pp. 1–78.
-
- Riley M. Marketing Eating Out. Br Food J. 1994;96:15–18. doi: 10.1108/00070709410072463. - DOI
-
- Hucker R. Market report 2013: Fast-Food & Home-Delivery Outlets. 27th ed: Key Note Ltd; 2013. p. 75.
-
- Jaworowska AM, Blackham T, Long R, Taylor C, Ashton M, Stevenson L, Glynn Davies I. Nutritional composition of takeaway food in the UK. Nutrition & Food Science. 2014;44:414–430. doi: 10.1108/NFS-08-2013-0093. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources