Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 26;8(1):e018546.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018546.

Cross-sectional study assessing the addition of contrast sensitivity to visual acuity when testing for fitness to drive

Affiliations

Cross-sectional study assessing the addition of contrast sensitivity to visual acuity when testing for fitness to drive

Lucie Spreng et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to quantify the importance of loss of contrast sensitivity (CS) and its relationship to loss of visual acuity (VA), driving restrictions and daytime, on-road driving evaluations in drivers aged 70+.

Design: A predictive cross-sectional study.

Setting: Volunteer participants to a drivers' refresher course for adults aged 70+ delivered by the Swiss Automobile Club in western Switzerland from 2011 to 2013.

Participants: 162 drivers, male and female, aged 70 years or older.

Clinical predictors: We used a vision screener to estimate VA and the The Mars Letter Contrast Sensitivity Test to test CS.

Outcomes: We asked drivers to report whether they found five driving restrictions useful for their condition; restrict driving to known roads, avoid driving on highways, avoid driving in the dark, avoid driving in dense traffic and avoid driving in fog. All participants also underwent a standardised on-road evaluation carried out by a driving instructor.

Results: Moderate to severe loss of CS for at least one eye was frequent (21.0% (95% CI 15.0% to 28.1%)) and often isolated from a loss of VA (11/162 cases had a VA ≥0.8 decimal and a CS of ≤1.5 log(CS); 6.8% (95% CI 3.4% to 11.8%)). Drivers were more likely (R2=0.116, P=0.004) to report a belief that self-imposed driving restrictions would be useful if they had reduced CS in at least one eye. Daytime evaluation of driving performance seems limited in its ability to correctly identify difficulties related to CS loss (VA: R2=0.004, P=0.454; CS: R2=0.006, P=0.332).

Conclusion: CS loss is common for older drivers. Screening CS and referring for cataract surgery even in the absence of VA loss could help maintain mobility. Reduced CS and moderate reduction of VA were both poor predictors of daytime on-road driving performances in this research study.

Keywords: ageing; automobile driving; contrast sensitivity; vision screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow chart. CS, contrast sensitivity; GarAge, Guarding Aged drivers against accidents project.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Driving performances between drivers with normal contrast sensitivity (CS) and those with low CS. (A) On-road driving score ranges from 0 to 8 with higher scores indicating more errors. (B) Driving restriction score ranges from 0 to 20 with higher scores indicating higher levels of restriction.

References

    1. Adler G, Rottunda S. Older adults' perspectives on driving cessation. J Aging Stud 2006;20:227–35. 10.1016/j.jaging.2005.09.003 - DOI
    1. Niemann S, Achermann Stürmer Y, Bianchi G, et al. . STATUS 2016: statistique des accidents non professionnels et du niveau de sécurité en Suisse; circulation routière, sport, habitat et loisirs. bpa 2016. 10.13100/bfu.2.275.02 - DOI
    1. Ryan GA, Legge M, Rosman D. Age related changes in drivers' crash risk and crash type. Accid Anal Prev 1998;30:379–87. 10.1016/S0001-4575(97)00098-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wagner JT, Müri RM, Nef T, et al. . Cognition and driving in older persons. Swiss Med Wkly 2011;140:w13136 10.4414/smw.2011.13136 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Owsley C, Stalvey BT, Phillips JM. The efficacy of an educational intervention in promoting self-regulation among high-risk older drivers. Accid Anal Prev 2003;35:393–400. 10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00016-7 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types