Investigation of the Changes in Refractive Surgery Trends in Korea
- PMID: 29376229
- PMCID: PMC5801094
- DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2017.0010
Investigation of the Changes in Refractive Surgery Trends in Korea
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate changes in clinical practice in the field of refractive surgery in Korea over the past 10 years.
Methods: A survey consisting of 59 multiple-choice questions regarding the preferred types of refractive surgery, excimer laser machine, and presbyopia surgery was mailed to 742 members of the Korean Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery in January 2016, and 50 members responded to the survey. These data were compared with the 2005 or 2007 survey results.
Results: The majority of respondents were in their 40s (54%), and the average number of refractive surgeries performed in one month was 53. The most commonly used excimer laser machine was the VISX S4 in both 2005 (32%) and 2015 (25%); however, a greater variety of machines (EX500 [18%], Allegretto wave Eye-Q [13%], AMARIS 750 [10%]) were used in 2015. The preferred corneal refractive surgery in 2015 was surface ablation (40%), representing a significant increase in its popularity compared to 2005 (15%) (p < 0.001). The popularity of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery decreased to 20% in 2015 compared to 48% in 2005 (p < 0.001). Eighty percent of LASIK procedures in 2015 were performed using femtosecond laser. In 2015, surface ablation and phakic intraocular lens implantation were preferred for the treatment of myopia less than -8 diopters and more than -8 diopters, respectively. The proportion of respondents performing presbyopia surgery in 2015 (76%) was significantly increased from 2007 (30%) (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Over the past decade, the most commonly performed corneal refractive surgery has changed from LASIK to surface ablation, and there has been a significant increase in the popularity of presbyopia surgery.
Keywords: Laser in situ keratomileusis; Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy; Presbyopia surgery; Refractive surgical procedures; Trends.
© 2018 The Korean Ophthalmological Society
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures




Similar articles
-
US trends in refractive surgery: 2003 ISRS/AAO survey.J Refract Surg. 2005 Jan-Feb;21(1):87-91. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20050101-16. J Refract Surg. 2005. PMID: 15724690
-
U.S. trends in refractive surgery: 2001 International Society of Refractive Surgery Survey.J Refract Surg. 2002 Mar-Apr;18(2):185-8. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20020301-14. J Refract Surg. 2002. PMID: 11934209
-
US trends in refractive surgery: 2002 ISRS survey.J Refract Surg. 2003 May-Jun;19(3):357-63. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20030501-14. J Refract Surg. 2003. PMID: 12777033
-
Advances in Refractive Surgery: June 2014 to July 2015.Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2016 May;5(3):212-22. doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000200. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2016. PMID: 27183291 Review.
-
Refractive surgery.Lancet. 2019 May 18;393(10185):2085-2098. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33209-4. Lancet. 2019. PMID: 31106754 Review.
Cited by
-
Visual outcomes and safety after bilateral implantation of a trifocal presbyopia correcting intraocular lens in a Korean population: a prospective single-arm study.BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul 15;20(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01549-z. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 32669090 Free PMC article.
-
Epidemiological insights into complication and outcomes in corneal refractive surgery population: findings from KNHANES 2010-2012.BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 28;25(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-03981-5. BMC Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 40155855 Free PMC article.
-
Presbyopia - A Review of Current Treatment Options and Emerging Therapies.Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 May 24;15:2167-2178. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S259011. eCollection 2021. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021. PMID: 34079215 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Recent trends of refractive surgery rate and detailed analysis of subjects with refractive surgery: The 2008-2015 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.PLoS One. 2021 Dec 23;16(12):e0261347. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261347. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34941889 Free PMC article.
-
Central Toxic Keratopathy after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction.Korean J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun;34(3):254-255. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2019.0122. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 32495535 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Munnerlyn CR, Koons SJ, Marshall J. Photorefractive keratectomy: a technique for laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1988;14:46–52. - PubMed
-
- Pallikaris IG, Papatzanaki ME, Siganos DS, Tsilimbaris MK. A corneal flap technique for laser in situ keratomileusis. Human studies. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:1699–1702. - PubMed
-
- Camellin M. Laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia. J Refract Surg. 2003;19:666–670. - PubMed
-
- Shyn KH, Yoon SC. Refractive surgery 2005 in Korea. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2008;49:570–576.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous