Outcome and prognostic factors in cervical cancer patients treated with surgery and concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective study
- PMID: 29378625
- PMCID: PMC5789695
- DOI: 10.1186/s12957-017-1307-0
Outcome and prognostic factors in cervical cancer patients treated with surgery and concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective study
Abstract
Background: The objective of this study is to analyze the treatment outcome and secondary reactions in 98 patients with stage I-III cervical carcinoma who underwent postoperative radiotherapy.
Methods: From 2006 to 2014, 98 patients with stage I-III cervical carcinoma were treated with postoperative radiotherapy. The major histological type, found in 92.86% of the patients (91 cases), was squamous cell carcinoma. Patients were staged according to the 2002 TNM guidelines. The postoperative radiotherapy methods included two-field irradiation (16 patients, 16.32%), four-field box irradiation (16 patients, 16.32%), and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT; 66 patients, 67.36%). The survival rates were represented using Kaplan-Meier curves, and prognosis analyses were performed using Cox multivariate analyses.
Results: The 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 82.0 and 76.0%, respectively. Only one patient (1.02%) developed a grade 3 acute radiation enteritis, while grade 3 and 4 myelosuppression was noted in 17 patients (17.35%) and one patient (1.02%), respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that anemia before radiotherapy and tumor size were predictors of the OS (P = 0.008, P = 0.045) rates.
Conclusions: Postoperative radiotherapy for patients with risk factors of cervical cancer procured good efficacy levels with mild side effects. Anemia and tumor size were important OS predictors.
Keywords: Cervical carcinoma; Chemoradiotherapy; Postoperative radiotherapy; Prognosis.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the ethical committee of Tai Zhou Central Hospital.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this report and the accompanying images.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
References
-
- J. Ferlay, I. Soerjomataram, R. Dikshit, et al.Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012, Int. J.Cancer 136 (2015) E359-E386. - PubMed
-
- Ohara K, Sugahara S, Kagei K, Hata M, Igaki H, Tokuuye K, et al. Retrospective comparison of clinical outcome between radiotherapy alone and surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy in the treatment of stages IB-IIB cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Radiat Med. 2004;22:42–48. - PubMed
-
- Peters WA, 3rd, Liu PY, Barrett RJ, 2nd, Stock RJ, Monk BJ, Berek JS, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:1606–1613. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.8.1606. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
