Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct 2;4(2):2055102917730675.
doi: 10.1177/2055102917730675. eCollection 2017 Jul-Dec.

Validation of the English and French versions of the Brief Health Care Climate Questionnaire

Zofia Czajkowska  1 , Hui Wang  1 , Nathan C Hall  1 , Maida Sewitch  2 , Annett Körner  1
Affiliations

Validation of the English and French versions of the Brief Health Care Climate Questionnaire

Zofia Czajkowska et al. Health Psychol Open. .

Abstract

Patient autonomy is a central value in medicine and critical component of adherence to medical advice. This article reports on a validation of the 6-item version of the Health Care Climate Questionnaire (HCCQ), a measure of autonomy support in health care settings, in a sample of 242 melanoma patients. The HCCQ showed excellent internal consistency (α = .91), structural validity (Tucker-Lewis index = .99; comparative fit index = .99; root mean square error of approximation = .06, 90 per cent confidence interval (.00, .11); standardized root mean square residual = .02; χ2 (8, N = 235) = 13.99, p = .08) and construct validity (92.31% of hypothesized correlations with other measures confirmed). Acceptable 3-month test-retest reliability was observed (r = .55, p < .001; intraclass correlation coefficient (A, 1) = .54, p < .001). The French version was found equivalent to the English version.

Keywords: Health Care Climate Questionnaire; Health Care Climate Questionnaire–brief version; Health Care Climate Questionnaire–short version; Health Care Climate Questionnaire–version francaise; melanoma; patient autonomy; skin cancer; validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Banville D, Desrosiers P, Genet-Volet Y. (2000) Translating questionnaires and inventories using a cross-cultural translation technique. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 19: 374–387.
    1. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. (2001) Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
    1. Beck AT, Emery G, Greenberg RL. (1985) Anxiety Disorders and Phobias: A Cognitive Perspective. New York: Basic Books.
    1. Berg JS, Dischler J, Wagner DJ, et al. (1993) Medication compliance: A healthcare problem. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 27: S1–S24. - PubMed
    1. Bergeron C, Moran C, Coroiu A, et al. (2017) Development and preliminary validation of the Self-Efficacy for Skin Self-Examination Scale in a Canadian sample of melanoma patients. Manuscript submitted for publication. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources