Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec 8;4(6):ENEURO.0311-16.2017.
doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0311-16.2017. eCollection 2017 Nov-Dec.

Electrophysiology Reveals the Neural Dynamics of Naturalistic Auditory Language Processing: Event-Related Potentials Reflect Continuous Model Updates

Affiliations

Electrophysiology Reveals the Neural Dynamics of Naturalistic Auditory Language Processing: Event-Related Potentials Reflect Continuous Model Updates

Phillip M Alday et al. eNeuro. .

Abstract

The recent trend away from ANOVA-based analyses places experimental investigations into the neurobiology of cognition in more naturalistic and ecologically valid designs within reach. Using mixed-effects models for epoch-based regression, we demonstrate the feasibility of examining event-related potentials (ERPs), and in particular the N400, to study the neural dynamics of human auditory language processing in a naturalistic setting. Despite the large variability between trials during naturalistic stimulation, we replicated previous findings from the literature: the effects of frequency, animacy, and word order and find previously unexplored interaction effects. This suggests a new perspective on ERPs, namely, as a continuous modulation reflecting continuous stimulation instead of a series of discrete and essentially sequential processes locked to discrete events.

Keywords: ecological validity; mixed-effects models; naturalistic stimuli; predictive coding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Single trial and average ERPs from electrode CPz from a single subject for unambiguous accusatives placed before a nominative. In the upper part, single trials are displayed stacked and sorted from top to bottom in decreasing orthographic length as a weak proxy for acoustic length, while the lower part displays the average ERP. Amplitude is given by color in the upper part and by the y-axis in the lower part. The dashed vertical lines indicate the boundaries of the N400 time window, 300 and 500 ms after stimulus onset.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Time course of regression coefficients for the interaction between morphology and position (at the head noun of the NP), first calculated within and then averaged over participants (following the traditional grand-average methodology) with only the predictors shown for computational tractability. This is equivalent to the traditional difference wave (Smith and Kutas, 2015a). Note that already at word onset, the effects have begun to diverge; the effects at a given word in a naturalistic context reflect the sum of the context and word-local, complex interactions. Large variances in word length enhance this effect.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Time course of regression coefficients for the effect of frequency (logarithmic class), first calculated within and then averaged over participants (following the traditional grand-average methodology) with only the predictors shown for computational tractability. This is analogous to the traditional difference wave (Smith and Kutas, 2015a), but instead of the difference between binary classes represents the average difference between frequency classes, i.e., the average difference in the wave form for every order-of-magnitude reduction in frequency. Note that already at word onset, the effects have begun to diverge; the effects at a given word in a naturalistic context reflect the sum of the context and word-local, complex interactions. Large variances in word length enhance this effect.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Grand average plot for the upper and lower tertiles of frequency (logarithmic class). Note that already at word onset, the effects have begun to diverge; the effects at a given word in a naturalistic context reflect the sum of the context and word-local, complex interactions. Large variances in word length enhance this effect. Nonetheless, the overall effect of frequency is so large that the change overcomes the initial offsets. This is visible as the change in sign for the regression coefficients in Figure 3.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Plot of effects for corpus frequency interacting with index (ordinal position in the story). Shaded areas indicate 95% confidence intervals. Light points are grand averages by participants over all trials; the corresponding lines are standard error of the (grand) mean. Index is divided into tertiles and plotted in an overlap to show the interaction. There is an increasing negativity with decreasing frequency (higher logarithmic class), which is weakly affected by position in the story.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Plot of effects for relative frequency interacting with index. Shaded areas indicate 95% confidence intervals. Light points are grand averages by participants over trials; the corresponding lines are standard error of the (grand) mean. Index is divided into tertiles.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Interaction of position, morphology, and corpus frequency from the full sentence-feature model with index and frequency class. Shaded areas indicate 95% confidence intervals. Light gray points are grand averages by participants over all trials; the corresponding lines are standard error of the (grand) mean. Interactions with position show themselves as differences between the top and bottom rows, while interactions with morphology show themselves as differences between columns.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
Interaction of animacy, morphology and position from the full sentence-feature model with index and frequency class. Bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. Light red points are grand averages by participants over all trials; the corresponding lines are standard error of the (grand) mean. Interactions with position show themselves as differences between the top and bottom rows, while interactions with animacy show themselves as differences between columns.

References

    1. Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19:716–723. 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705 - DOI
    1. Alday PM (2017) How much baseline correction do we need in ERP research? extended GLM model can replace baseline correction while lifting its limits. arXiv 1707.08152v1. - PubMed
    1. Baayen RH, Davidson DJ, Bates DM (2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J Mem Lang 59:390–412. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 - DOI
    1. Barr DJ, Levy R, Scheepers C, Tily HJ (2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. J Mem Lang 68:255–278. 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bates D, Kliegl R, Vasishth S, Baayen H (2015a) Parsimonius mixed models. arXiv 1506.04967v1.

LinkOut - more resources