Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan;6(2):e13557.
doi: 10.14814/phy2.13557.

Cross talk between β subunits, intracellular Ca2+ signaling, and SNAREs in the modulation of CaV 2.1 channel steady-state inactivation

Affiliations

Cross talk between β subunits, intracellular Ca2+ signaling, and SNAREs in the modulation of CaV 2.1 channel steady-state inactivation

Selma Angèlica Serra et al. Physiol Rep. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

Modulation of CaV 2.1 channel activity plays a key role in interneuronal communication and synaptic plasticity. SNAREs interact with a specific synprint site at the second intracellular loop (LII-III) of the CaV 2.1 pore-forming α1A subunit to optimize neurotransmitter release from presynaptic terminals by allowing secretory vesicles docking near the Ca2+ entry pathway, and by modulating the voltage dependence of channel steady-state inactivation. Ca2+ influx through CaV 2.1 also promotes channel inactivation. This process seems to involve Ca2+ -calmodulin interaction with two adjacent sites in the α1A carboxyl tail (C-tail) (the IQ-like motif and the Calmodulin-Binding Domain (CBD) site), and contributes to long-term potentiation and spatial learning and memory. Besides, binding of regulatory β subunits to the α interaction domain (AID) at the first intracellular loop (LI-II) of α1A determines the degree of channel inactivation by both voltage and Ca2+ . Here, we explore the cross talk between β subunits, Ca2+ , and syntaxin-1A-modulated CaV 2.1 inactivation, highlighting the α1A domains involved in such process. β3 -containing CaV 2.1 channels show syntaxin-1A-modulated but no Ca2+ -dependent steady-state inactivation. Conversely, β2a -containing CaV 2.1 channels show Ca2+ -dependent but not syntaxin-1A-modulated steady-state inactivation. A LI-II deletion confers Ca2+ -dependent inactivation and prevents modulation by syntaxin-1A in β3 -containing CaV 2.1 channels. Mutation of the IQ-like motif, unlike CBD deletion, abolishes Ca2+ -dependent inactivation and confers modulation by syntaxin-1A in β2a -containing CaV 2.1 channels. Altogether, these results suggest that LI-II structural modifications determine the regulation of CaV 2.1 steady-state inactivation either by Ca2+ or by SNAREs but not by both.

Keywords: Ca2+-calmodulin; CaV2.1 domains for SNARE-mediated modulation; CaV2.1 steady-state inactivation; CaVβ subunits; presynaptic voltage-gated CaV2.1 channels; syntaxin-1A.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Location of the known α 1A molecular determinants for the binding of the main intracellular proteins that modulate CaV2.1 channel inactivation. (A) Schematic representation of the secondary structure of the CaV2.1 α 1A channel subunit, showing the location of the known α 1A molecular determinants for the binding of three cytosolic proteins involved in the regulation of CaV2.1 channel inactivation: (1) regulatory β subunits (which binds to the α‐interaction domain or AID, located in the cytoplasmic loop connecting domains I and II (LIII) of α 1A); (2) SNARE proteins (that interacts with the synprint site, within the intracellular loop connecting domains II and III (LIIIII) of α 1A); and (3) the Ca2+‐calmodulin (Ca2+‐CaM) complex (which binds to the IQ‐like motif and the Calmodulin‐Binding Domain (CBD) site, at the carboxyl tail of α 1A). (B) Location of the α 1A LIII deletion around the A454 residue (ΔLIII 451–457) (also depicted at panel A).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Steady‐state inactivation of CaV2.1 channels containing the regulatory β 3 subunit is independent of intracellular Ca2+ signaling and is favored by syntaxin‐1A (A) Voltage protocol for the study of CaV2.1 channels steady‐state inactivation (see Methods for further details). Representative normalized Ca2+ current traces recorded at intermediate (1 mmol/L EGTA) (B) or high (10 mmol/L BAPTA) (C) intracellular Ca2+‐buffering conditions from a HEK 293 cell expressing CaV2.1 channels composed of wild‐type α 1A, β 3, and α 2 δ subunits (WT β 3) either in the absence (left) or presence (right) of syntaxin‐1A (stx 1A). Currents were elicited by 50 ms depolarizing steps to +20 mV applied after 30‐sec depolarizing prepulses to the indicated voltages. Amplitudes of currents elicited by test pulses to +20 mV after the different prepulses were normalized to the maximum current amplitude obtained after a 30‐sec prepulse to −80 mV in order to generate the corresponding mean steady‐state inactivation curves (D), which were fitted to a single Boltzmann function (see Methods, eq. (1)) to estimate the half‐inactivation potentials (V1/2 inactivation) (E) for WT CaV2.1 channels containing the β 3 subunit (WT β 3) in the absence (open circles) or presence (filled circles) of syntaxin‐1A (stx 1A), at the above indicated intracellular Ca2+‐buffering conditions. Average V1/2 inact and kinact values at intermediate Ca2+‐buffering condition (1 mmol/L EGTA) were (in mV): WT β 3 (open circles, n = 18) −23.7 ± 0.83 and −5.16 ± 0.24; WT β 3 + stx 1A (filled circles, n = 12) −32.74 ± 1.46 and −5.5 ± 0.19, respectively. At high Ca2+‐buffering condition (10 mmol/L BAPTA), average V1/2 inact and kinact values were (in mV): WT β 3 (open circles, n = 12) −20.74 ± 1.18 and −4.78 ± 0.16; WT β 3 + stx 1A (filled circles, n = 8) −25.68 ± 1.13 and −5.25 ± 0.21, respectively. a and b: P < 0.001 and P < 0.05 versus the corresponding control condition (absence of syntaxin‐1A), respectively; c: P < 0.01 when compared to the intermediate Ca2+‐buffering condition (1 mmol/L EGTA). No significant difference was found for kinact values (ANOVA P = 0.17).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Δ451‐457 at α 1A LIII promotes a Ca2+‐dependent component in the steady‐state inactivation of CaV2.1 channels containing the auxiliary β 3 subunit, and it prevents syntaxin‐1A‐mediated modulation. Typical normalized Ca2+ current traces recorded at intermediate (1 mmol/L EGTA) (A) or high (10 mmol/L BAPTA) (B) intracellular Ca2+‐buffering conditions from a HEK 293 cell expressing CaV2.1 channels composed of mutant ΔLIII 451–457 α 1A, β 3, and α 2 δ subunits (ΔLIII β 3) either in the absence (left) or presence (right) of syntaxin‐1A (stx 1A). Currents were elicited by 50‐ms depolarizing steps to +20 mV applied after 30‐sec depolarizing prepulses to the shown voltages. Corresponding mean normalized steady‐state inactivation curves (C), and derived V1/2 inactivation (D) for ΔLIII 451–457 CaV2.1 mutant channels containing the β 3 subunit (ΔLIII β 3) in the absence (open circles) or presence (filled circles) of syntaxin‐1A (stx 1A), at the above indicated intracellular Ca2+‐buffering conditions. Average V1/2 inact and kinact values at intermediate Ca2+‐buffering condition (1 mmol/L EGTA) were (in mV): ΔLIII β 3 (open circles, n = 14) −29.58 ± 1.35 and −4.73 ± 0.16; ΔLIII β 3 + stx 1A (filled circles, n = 9) −30 ± 1.85 and −5.73 ± 0.35, respectively. At high Ca2+‐buffering condition (10 mmol/L BAPTA), average V1/2 inact and kinact values were (in mV): ΔLIII β 3 (open circles, n = 9) −21.84 ± 0.83 and −4.94 ± 0.47; ΔLIII β 3 + stx 1A (filled circles, n = 8) −27.94 ± 1.15 and −4.97 ± 0.33, respectively. a: P < 0.001 when compared to the intermediate Ca2+‐buffering condition (1 mmol/L EGTA); b: P < 0.05 versus the corresponding control condition (absence of syntaxin‐1A). No significant difference was found for kinact values (ANOVA P = 0.14).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Steady‐state inactivation of CaV2.1 channels containing the regulatory β 2a subunit presents a Ca2+‐dependent component and no regulation by syntaxin‐1A. Illustrative normalized Ca2+ current traces recorded at intermediate (1 mmol/L EGTA) (A) or high (10 mmol/L BAPTA) (B) intracellular Ca2+‐buffering conditions from a HEK 293 cell expressing CaV2.1 channels composed of WT α 1A, β 2a, and α 2 δ subunits (WT β 2a) either in the absence (left) or presence (right) of syntaxin‐1A (stx 1A). Currents were elicited by 50‐ms depolarizing steps to +20 mV applied after 30‐sec depolarizing prepulses to the indicated voltages. Corresponding mean normalized steady‐state inactivation curves (C), and estimated V1/2 inactivation (D) for ΔLIII 451–457 CaV2.1 mutant channels containing the β 2a subunit (WT β 2a) in the absence (open circles) or presence (filled circles) of syntaxin‐1A (stx 1A), at the above indicated intracellular Ca2+‐buffering conditions. Average V1/2 inact and kinact values at intermediate Ca2+‐buffering condition (1 mmol/L EGTA) were (in mV): WT β 2a (open circles, n = 12) −12.08 ± 1.36 and −2.43 ± 0.41; WT β 2a + stx 1A (filled circles, n = 11) −14.53 ± 1.02 and −2.33 ± 0.28, respectively. At high Ca2+‐buffering condition (10 mmol/L BAPTA), average V1/2 inact and kinact values were (in mV): WT β 2a (open circles, n = 9) −2.78 ± 0.95 and −3.1 ± 0.52; WT β 2a + stx 1A (filled circles, n = 11) −7.57 ± 1.36 and −3.15 ± 0.55, respectively. a: P < 0.001 when compared to the intermediate Ca2+‐buffering condition (1 mmol/L EGTA); b: P < 0.05 versus the corresponding control condition (absence of syntaxin‐1A). No significant difference was found for kinact values (ANOVA P = 0.44).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Steady‐state inactivation of CaV2.1 channels formed by mutant α 1A ΔLIII 451–457 and β 2a subunits remains Ca2+‐dependent and syntaxin‐1A‐insensitive. Representative normalized Ca2+ current traces recorded at intermediate (1 mmol/L EGTA) (A) or high (10 mmol/L BAPTA) (B) intracellular Ca2+‐buffering conditions from a HEK 293 cell expressing CaV2.1 channels composed of mutant ΔLIII 451–457 α 1A, β 2a, and α 2 δ subunits (ΔLIII β 2a) either in the absence (left) or presence (right) of syntaxin‐1A (stx 1A). Currents were elicited by 50‐ms depolarizing steps to +20 mV applied after 30‐sec depolarizing prepulses to the indicated voltages. Amplitudes of currents elicited by test pulses to +20 mV after the different prepulses were normalized to the maximum current amplitude obtained after a 30‐sec prepulse to −80 mV in order to generate the corresponding mean steady‐state inactivation curves (C), which were fitted to a single Boltzmann function (see Methods, eq. (1)) to estimate the half‐inactivation potentials (V1/2 inactivation) (D) for mutant ΔLIII 451–457 CaV2.1 mutant channels containing the β 2a subunit (ΔLIII β 2a) in the absence (open circles) or presence (filled circles) of syntaxin‐1A (stx 1A), at the above indicated intracellular Ca2+‐buffering conditions. Average V1/2 inact and kinact values at intermediate Ca2+‐buffering condition (1 mmol/L EGTA) were (in mV): ΔLIII β 2a (open circles, n = 8) −11.47 ± 0.86 and −2.87 ± 0.5; ΔLIII β 2a + stx 1A (filled circles, n = 9) −13.57 ± 1.15 and −2.73 ± 0.44, respectively. At high Ca2+‐buffering condition (10 mmol/L BAPTA), average V1/2 inact and kinact values were (in mV): ΔLIII β 2a (open circles, n = 9) −2.58 ± 0.99 and −2.05 ± 0.43; ΔLIII β 2a + stx 1A (filled circles, n = 9) −7.45 ± 1.15 and −2.12 ± 0.51, respectively. a: P < 0.001 when compared to the intermediate Ca2+‐buffering condition (1 mmol/L EGTA); b: P < 0.01 versus the corresponding control condition (absence of syntaxin‐1A). No significant difference was found for kinact values (ANOVA P = 0.51).
Figure 6
Figure 6
α 1A IQ‐like motif mutation (IM/EE) remove the Ca2+‐dependent component in the steady‐state inactivation of β 2a‐containing CaV2.1 channels, and it allows modulation by syntaxin‐1A. Representative normalized Ca2+ current traces recorded at intermediate (1 mmol/L EGTA) (A) or high (10 mmol/L BAPTA) (B) intracellular Ca2+‐buffering conditions from a HEK 293 cell expressing CaV2.1 channels composed of mutant IM/EE α 1A, β 2a, and α 2 δ subunits (IM/EE β 2a) either in the absence (left) or presence (right) of syntaxin‐1A (stx 1A). Currents were elicited by 10‐ms depolarizing steps to +20 mV applied after 30‐sec depolarizing prepulses to the shown voltages. Corresponding mean normalized steady‐state inactivation curves (C), and derived V1/2 inactivation (D) for IM/EE CaV2.1 mutant channels containing the β 2a subunit (IM/EE β 2a) in the absence (open circles) or presence (filled circles) of syntaxin‐1A (stx 1A), at the above indicated intracellular Ca2+‐buffering conditions. Average V1/2 inact and kinact values at intermediate Ca2+‐buffering condition (1 mmol/L EGTA) were (in mV): IM/EE β 2a (open circles, n = 10) 4.19 ± 0.8 and ‐6.17 ± 0.5; IM/EE β 2a + stx 1A (filled circles, n = 11) −1.25 ± 1.71 and −6.44 ± 0.34, respectively. At high Ca2+‐buffering condition (10 mmol/L BAPTA), average V1/2 inact and kinact values were (in mV): IM/EE β 2a (open circles, n = 7) 1.4 ± 0.95 and ‐5.8 ± 0.62; IM/EE β 2a + stx 1A (filled circles, n = 9) −4.68 ± 1.71 and ‐6.21 ± 0.42, respectively. a: P < 0.05 versus the corresponding control condition (absence of syntaxin‐1A). No significant difference was found for kinact values (ANOVA P = 0.82).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Steady‐state inactivation of CaV2.1 channels formed by mutant α 1A ΔCBD and β 2a subunits still shows a Ca2+‐dependent component and no regulation by syntaxin‐1A. Typical normalized Ca2+ current traces recorded at intermediate (1 mmol/L EGTA) (A) or high (10 mmol/L BAPTA) (B) intracellular Ca2+‐buffering conditions from a HEK 293 cell expressing CaV2.1 channels composed of mutant ΔCBD α 1A, β 2a, and α 2 δ subunits (ΔCBD β 2a) either in the absence (left) or presence (right) of syntaxin‐1A (stx 1A). Currents were elicited by 50‐ms depolarizing steps to +20 mV applied after 30‐sec depolarizing prepulses to the shown voltages. Corresponding mean normalized steady‐state inactivation curves (C), and derived V1/2 inactivation (D) for ΔCBD CaV2.1 mutant channels containing the β 2a subunit (ΔCBD β 2a) in the absence (open circles) or presence (filled circles) of syntaxin‐1A (stx 1A), at the above indicated intracellular Ca2+‐buffering conditions. Average V1/2 inact and kinact values at intermediate Ca2+‐buffering condition (1 mmol/L EGTA) were (in mV): ΔCBD β 2a (open circles, n = 8) −12.48 ± 1.07 and −2.23 ± 0.25; ΔCBD β 2a + stx 1A (filled circles, n = 6) −14.75 ± 1.53 and −2.59 ± 0.31, respectively. At high Ca2+‐buffering condition (10 mmol/L BAPTA), average V1/2 inact and kinact values were (in mV): ΔCBD β 2a (open circles, n = 12) −4.43 ± 1.15 and −3.68 ± 0.25; ΔCBD β 2a + stx 1A (filled circles, n = 12) −9.6 ± 1.61 and −4.52 ± 0.5, respectively. a: P < 0.01 when compared to the intermediate Ca2+‐buffering condition (1 mmol/L EGTA); b: P < 0.05 versus the corresponding control condition (absence of syntaxin‐1A). kinact values were significantly higher (P < 0.05) at high Ca2+‐buffering condition (10 mmol/L BAPTA) than at intermediate Ca2+‐buffering condition (1 mmol/L EGTA). The presence of syntaxin‐1A had no significant effect on kinact.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Sequence alignment of intracellular loop between domains I and II (LIII) of human CaV2.1 channel α 1A subunit and rabbit CaV1.2 channel α 1C subunit. Alignments were performed with Clustal Omega (www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/). AID sequences are shown in purple, and rabbit (rb) α 1C LIII site for Ca2+‐calmodulin binding is highlighted in green. Position of the human (h) α 1A LIII deletion around A454 (in red) (ΔLIII 451–457) is shown in orange. “*” identical residues; “:” conservative substitutions (same amino acid group); “.” semi‐conservative substitution (similar shapes). LIII residues appear in bold.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Sequence alignment of intracellular domains (LIII, LIIIIV, and C‐tail) of human CaV2.1 channel α 1A subunit and rabbit CaV1.1 channel α 1S subunit. Alignments were performed with Clustal Omega (www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/). AID sequences at LIII are shown in purple, and the human (h) α 1A LIII deletion around A454 (in red) (ΔLIII 451–457) is highlighted in orange. Amino acids involved in the physical interaction between LIIIIV and C‐terminal domain (CTD) of rabbit (rb) α 1S, according to cryo‐EM structural data (Wu et al. 2016), and the homologous sequences in hα 1A are shown in brown. Sequences of the IQ (rbα 1S) and IQ‐like (hα 1A) motifs are shown in green. hα 1A CBD sequence is depicted in blue. Cytoplasmic segments that were invisible in the cryo‐EM structure of CaV1.1 rbα 1S subunit (Wu et al. 2016) are shown in gray. “*” identical residues; “:” conservative substitutions (same amino acid group); “.” semi‐ conservative substitution (similar shapes). LIII, LIIIIV, and CTD residues appear in bold.

References

    1. Atlas, D. 2013. The voltage‐gated calcium channel functions as the molecular switch of synaptic transmission. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 82:607–635. - PubMed
    1. Bachnoff, N. , Cohen‐Kutner M., Trus M., and Atlas D.. 2013. Intra‐membrane signaling between the voltage‐gated Ca2+‐channel and cysteine sesidues of syntaxin‐1A coordinates synchronous release. Sci. Rep. 3:1620. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bezprozvanny, I. , Scheller R. H., and Tsien R. W.. 1995. Functional impact of syntaxin on gating of N‐type and Q‐type calcium channels. Nature 378:623–626. - PubMed
    1. Bezprozvanny, I. , Zhong P., Scheller R. H., and Tsien R. W.. 2000. Molecular determinants of the functional interaction between syntaxin and N‐type Ca2+ channel gating. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97:13943–13948. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Birnbaumer, L. , Qin N., Olcese R., Tareilus E., Platano D., Costantin J., et al. 1998. Structures and functions of calcium channel β subunits. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 30:357–375. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources