Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb;12(2):E47-E52.
doi: 10.5489/cuaj.4600. Epub 2017 Dec 1.

A prognostic model for stratifying clinical outcomes in chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone acetate

Affiliations

A prognostic model for stratifying clinical outcomes in chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone acetate

Daniel Joseph Khalaf et al. Can Urol Assoc J. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: Recently, a prognostic index including six risk factors (RFs) (unfavourable Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status [ECOG PS], presence of liver metastases, short response to luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone [LHRH] agonists/antagonists, low albumin, increased alkaline phosphatase [ALP] and lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]) was developed from the COU-AA-301 trial in post-chemotherapy metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with abiraterone acetate. Our primary objective was to evaluate this model in a cohort of chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients receiving abiraterone.

Methods: We identified 197 chemotherapy-naive patients who received abiraterone at six BC Cancer Agency centres and who had complete information on all six RFs. Study endpoints were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (RR), time to PSA progression, time on treatment, and overall survival (OS). PSA RR and survival outcomes were compared using Χ2 test and log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to identify RFs independently associated with OS.

Results: Patients were classified into good (0-1 RFs), intermediate (2-3 RFs), and poor (4-6 RFs) prognostic groups (33%, 52%, and 15%, respectively). For good-, intermediate-, and poor-risk patients, PSA RR (≥50% decline) was 60% vs. 42% vs. 40% (p=0.05); median time to PSA progression was 7.3 vs. 5.3 vs. 5.0 months (p=0.02); and median OS was 29.4 vs. 13.8 vs. 8.7 months (p<0.0001).

Conclusions: The six-factor prognostic index model stratifies clinical outcomes in chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone. Identifying patients at risk of poor outcome is important for informing clinical practice and clinical trial design.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: Dr. Azad has been an advisor for Astellas, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Sanofi, and Tolmar; a speaker for Janssen; has received grants/honoraria from Astellas; and has participated in clinical trials supported by AstraZeneca, GSK, MedImmune, Medivation, Merck, Sanofi, and Serono. Dr. Todenhöfer has received speaker honoraria from Astellas and Janssen. Dr. Eigl has been an advisor for AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Roche; has received grants from Roche; and has participated in clinical trials supported by AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. Dr. Finch has received speaker honoraria from and has participated in clinical trials supported by Astellas, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Pfizer, and Roche. Dr. Le has received speaker honoraria from Bayer; and was involved in the BC Cancer Agency Canadian Cancer Trials Group. Dr. Kollmannsberger has been an advisor for Astellas, BMS, Novartis, and Pfizer; has received speaker honoraria from Astellas, BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi; and has participated in clinical trials supported by Asetllas, BMS, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer. Dr. Chi has received grants/honoraria from Astellas, Bayer, Essai, Janssen, and Sanofi; and has participated in clinical trials supported by Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Essai, Lilly, Janssen, Merck, and Sanofi. The remaining authors report no competing personal or financial interests related to this work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Kaplan-Meier curves for: (A) overall survival; (B) time on treatment; and (C) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression for good, intermediate, and poor prognosis groups.

References

    1. Heidenreich A, dPfister D, Merseburger A, et al. for German Working Group on Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (GWG-CRPC) Castration-resistant prostate cancer: Where we stand in 2013 and what urologists should know. Eur Urol. 2013;64:260–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Bono JS, Logothetis CJ, Molina A, et al. Abiraterone and increased survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1995–2005. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1014618. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ryan CJ, Smith MR, Fizazi K, et al. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone vs. placebo plus prednisone in chemotherapy-naive men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (COU-AA-302): Final overall survival analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:152–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71205-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chi KN, Kheoh T, Ryan CJ, et al. A prognostic index model for predicting overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with abiraterone acetate after docetaxel. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:454–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv594. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azad A, Lester R, Leibowitz-Amit R, et al. Population-based analysis of a novel prognostic model for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients (pts) treated with abiraterone acetate (AA) [abstract] J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:5S. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.32.4_suppl.29. - DOI