A prognostic model for stratifying clinical outcomes in chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone acetate
- PMID: 29381456
- PMCID: PMC5937410
- DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.4600
A prognostic model for stratifying clinical outcomes in chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone acetate
Abstract
Introduction: Recently, a prognostic index including six risk factors (RFs) (unfavourable Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status [ECOG PS], presence of liver metastases, short response to luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone [LHRH] agonists/antagonists, low albumin, increased alkaline phosphatase [ALP] and lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]) was developed from the COU-AA-301 trial in post-chemotherapy metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with abiraterone acetate. Our primary objective was to evaluate this model in a cohort of chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients receiving abiraterone.
Methods: We identified 197 chemotherapy-naive patients who received abiraterone at six BC Cancer Agency centres and who had complete information on all six RFs. Study endpoints were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (RR), time to PSA progression, time on treatment, and overall survival (OS). PSA RR and survival outcomes were compared using Χ2 test and log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to identify RFs independently associated with OS.
Results: Patients were classified into good (0-1 RFs), intermediate (2-3 RFs), and poor (4-6 RFs) prognostic groups (33%, 52%, and 15%, respectively). For good-, intermediate-, and poor-risk patients, PSA RR (≥50% decline) was 60% vs. 42% vs. 40% (p=0.05); median time to PSA progression was 7.3 vs. 5.3 vs. 5.0 months (p=0.02); and median OS was 29.4 vs. 13.8 vs. 8.7 months (p<0.0001).
Conclusions: The six-factor prognostic index model stratifies clinical outcomes in chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone. Identifying patients at risk of poor outcome is important for informing clinical practice and clinical trial design.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Heidenreich A, dPfister D, Merseburger A, et al. for German Working Group on Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (GWG-CRPC) Castration-resistant prostate cancer: Where we stand in 2013 and what urologists should know. Eur Urol. 2013;64:260–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.021. - DOI - PubMed
-
- de Bono JS, Logothetis CJ, Molina A, et al. Abiraterone and increased survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1995–2005. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1014618. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Ryan CJ, Smith MR, Fizazi K, et al. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone vs. placebo plus prednisone in chemotherapy-naive men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (COU-AA-302): Final overall survival analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:152–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71205-7. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chi KN, Kheoh T, Ryan CJ, et al. A prognostic index model for predicting overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with abiraterone acetate after docetaxel. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:454–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv594. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Azad A, Lester R, Leibowitz-Amit R, et al. Population-based analysis of a novel prognostic model for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients (pts) treated with abiraterone acetate (AA) [abstract] J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:5S. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.32.4_suppl.29. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous