Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jan 27;10(2):35.
doi: 10.3390/cancers10020035.

Reviewing the Utility of EUS FNA to Advance Precision Medicine in Pancreatic Cancer

Affiliations
Review

Reviewing the Utility of EUS FNA to Advance Precision Medicine in Pancreatic Cancer

William Berry et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) is an aggressive malignancy with few effective therapeutic options. While the evolution of precision medicine in recent decades has changed the treatment landscape in many cancers, at present no targeted therapies are used in the routine management of PC. Only a minority of patients with PC present with surgically resectable disease, and in the remainder obtaining high quality biopsy material for both diagnosis and molecular testing can prove challenging. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS FNA) is a widely used diagnostic procedure in PC, and allows tumour sampling in patients with both early and late stage disease. This review will provide an update on the role of EUS FNA as a diagnostic tool, as well as a source of genetic material which can be used both for molecular analysis and for the creation of valuable preclinical disease models. We will also consider relevant clinical applications of EUS FNA in the management of PC, and the path towards bringing precision medicine closer to the clinic in this challenging disease.

Keywords: EUS FNA; Pancreatic cancer; molecular oncology; precision medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Forest plot demonstrating hazard ratio for phase III clinical trials in pancreatic cancer that included a control arm of gemcitabine monotherapy for a consistent comparison
Figure 2
Figure 2
Venn diagram showing the differences between the genes up-regulated in PC in two published diagnostic gene signatures. Bhasin et al. [68] presented a five-gene signature up-regulated in PC compared to normal pancreas; Rodriguez, et al. [66] presented an 83 gene signature of up- and down-regulated in PC, they only published 20 up-regulated genes and 20 down-regulated genes.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jemal A., Siegel R., Ward E., Murray T., Xu J., Smigal C., Thun M.J. Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2006;56:106–130. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.56.2.106. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hidalgo M. Pancreatic cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;362:1605–1617. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0901557. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cascinu S., Jelic S., Group E.G.W. Pancreatic cancer: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2009 doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp123. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jemal A., Bray F., Center M.M., Ferlay J., Ward E., Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2011;61:69–90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wade T.P., Halaby I.A., Stapleton D.R., Virgo K.S., Johnson F.E. Population-based analysis of treatment of pancreatic cancer and Whipple resection: Department of Defense hospitals, 1989–1994. Surgery. 1996;120:680–685. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6060(96)80017-1. discussion 686–687. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources