Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jan 28;18(2):378.
doi: 10.3390/s18020378.

Plant Pest Detection Using an Artificial Nose System: A Review

Affiliations
Review

Plant Pest Detection Using an Artificial Nose System: A Review

Shaoqing Cui et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

This paper reviews artificial intelligent noses (or electronic noses) as a fast and noninvasive approach for the diagnosis of insects and diseases that attack vegetables and fruit trees. The particular focus is on bacterial, fungal, and viral infections, and insect damage. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from plants, which provide functional information about the plant's growth, defense, and health status, allow for the possibility of using noninvasive detection to monitor plants status. Electronic noses are comprised of a sensor array, signal conditioning circuit, and pattern recognition algorithms. Compared with traditional gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) techniques, electronic noses are noninvasive and can be a rapid, cost-effective option for several applications. However, using electronic noses for plant pest diagnosis is still in its early stages, and there are challenges regarding sensor performance, sampling and detection in open areas, and scaling up measurements. This review paper introduces each element of electronic nose systems, especially commonly used sensors and pattern recognition methods, along with their advantages and limitations. It includes a comprehensive comparison and summary of applications, possible challenges, and potential improvements of electronic nose systems for different plant pest diagnoses.

Keywords: electronic nose; gas sensor; noninvasive detection; pest management; pest scouting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An E-nose system based on QCM sensor array. MFC, mass flow control; DAQ, data acquisition.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Illustration of VOC collection system for infected plants.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Typical pattern recognition methods applied on E-nose system.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The applications of E-nose in plants disease detection.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nishi K., Isobe S.-I., Zhu Y., Kiyama R. Fluorescence-Based Bioassays for the Detection and Evaluation of Food Materials. Sensors. 2015;15:25831–25867. doi: 10.3390/s151025831. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nassuth A., Pollari E., Helmeczy K., Stewart S., Kofalvi S.A. Improved RNA extraction and one-tube RT-PCR assay for simultaneous detection of control plant RNA plus several viruses in plant extracts. J. Virol. Methods. 2000;90:37–49. doi: 10.1016/S0166-0934(00)00211-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clark M.F., Adams A.N. Characteristics of the microplate method of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of plant viruses. J. Gen. Virol. 1977;34:475–483. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-34-3-475. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mahlein A.K., Oerke E.C., Steiner U., Dehne H.W. Recent advances in sensing plant diseases for precision crop protection. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2012;133:197–209. doi: 10.1007/s10658-011-9878-z. - DOI
    1. Bürling K., Hunsche M., Noga G. Use of blue-green and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements for differentiation between nitrogen deficiency and pathogen infection in winter wheat. J. Plant Physiol. 2011;168:1641–1648. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.03.016. - DOI - PubMed

Substances