Investigation of Public Perception of Brain Death Using the Internet
- PMID: 29382473
- PMCID: PMC7339235
- DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.01.021
Investigation of Public Perception of Brain Death Using the Internet
Abstract
Background: Brain death is a difficult concept for the public to comprehend, resulting in a reliance on alternative resources for clarity. This study aims to understand the public's perception of brain death via analysis of information on the Internet, determine the accuracy of that information, and understand how its perception affects the physician-patient relationship.
Methods: We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study to evaluate information available to the public about brain death. The top 10 Google websites were analyzed for language complexity and accuracy in describing brain death. The top 10 YouTube videos were examined for content and the comments qualitatively analyzed for themes.
Results: Inaccuracies describing brain death inconsistent with national guidelines were prevalent amongst 4 of 10 Google websites, 6 of 10 YouTube videos, and 80% of YouTube comments. On average, Google websites were written at a 12th grade level and 90% mentioned organ donation. Videos were frequently emotional (78%); 33% included negative comments toward physicians, of which 50% mentioned organ donation. All videos included clarification comments questioning the differences between brain death, death, coma, and persistent vegetative states.
Conclusions: The study revealed a significant amount of inaccurate information about brain death, affecting the public's understanding of the concept of brain death and resulting in negative emotions specifically toward physicians, and the link between brain death and organ donation. The medical community can improve understanding through consistent, simplified language, dissociating brain death from organ donation, and recognizing the emotions tied to discussions of brain death.
Keywords: brain injury; critical care; health communication.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Trust the Internet or Trust Your Physician: Public Perception of Brain Death Isn't a No Brainer.Chest. 2018 Aug;154(2):238-239. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.04.023. Chest. 2018. PMID: 30080498 No abstract available.
-
Are All Brain Death Controversies on The Internet Fake Medical News?Chest. 2019 Jan;155(1):238-239. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.08.1068. Chest. 2019. PMID: 30616726 No abstract available.
-
Response.Chest. 2019 Jan;155(1):239-240. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.08.1067. Chest. 2019. PMID: 30616727 No abstract available.
References
-
- Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death. A definition of irreversible coma: report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death. JAMA. 1968;205(6):337–340. - PubMed
-
- Conference of Medical Royal Colleges and Their Faculties in the UK Diagnosis of death. Lancet. 1979;1(8110):261–262. - PubMed
-
- Uniform Determination of Death Act. http://www.lchc.ucsd.edu/cogn_150/Readings/death_act.pdf. Published February 10, 1981. Accessed February 2, 2018.
-
- Wijdicks E.F., Varelas P.N., Gronseth G.W., Greer D.M. American Academy of Neurology. Evidence-based guideline update: determining brain death in adults: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2010;74(23):1911–1918. - PubMed
-
- Nakagawa T.A., Ashwal S., Mathur M. Clinical report: guidelines for the determination of brain death in infants and children: an update of the 1987 task force recommendations. Pediatrics. 2011;128(3):e720–e740. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources