Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar;17(1):44-51.
doi: 10.1007/s12663-016-0992-5. Epub 2016 Dec 18.

C omparative Evaluation of the Intranasal Spray Formulation of Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine in Patients Undergoing Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Split Mouth Prospective Study

Affiliations

C omparative Evaluation of the Intranasal Spray Formulation of Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine in Patients Undergoing Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Split Mouth Prospective Study

Shashank Hiwarkar et al. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2018 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this prospective randomized single blinded split mouth study was to conduct a comparative evaluation of the efficacy of intranasal atomised spray formulation of Dexmedetomidine with Midazolam in patients undergoing surgical removal of bilaterally impacted mandibular third molars.

Methods: This prospective study was conducted in twenty volunteers. Each volunteer underwent the surgical removal of an impacted mandibular third molar at two separate appointments at an interval of two weeks. The first third molar surgery was conducted using either intranasal Midazolam (Group M) or intranasal Dexmedetomidine (Group D). At the second appointment the surgical procedure was performed using the sedative agent not used at the first appointment. The primary testing outcome variables were Plasma oxygen saturation (SpO2), pulse and blood pressure and Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scale. These were recorded at predetermined intervals starting 10 min before the administration of local anaesthesia and continued up to 10 min after completion of the procedure. In addition surgeon's opinion regarding the patient cooperation, event amnesia, post operative nausea & vomiting were obtained.

Results: The sample composed of twenty patients (M = 9 and F = 11). There was statistically no significant difference between Group M and Group D with respect to mean SpO2. Minor differences were however noted at 20 and 30 min after sedation. There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to mean pulse rate, blood pressure, OAA/S, event amnesia, post operative nausea and vomiting and patient cooperation.

Conclusion: We conclude that Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine are equivalent and can be used in minor oral surgery with minimal complications. These drugs can be used intranasally using nasal atomization device in routine outpatient basis in otherwise normal healthy but anxious patients. All procedures must however be performed in the presence of an anaesthesiologist and with ready availability of emergency drugs and equipment.

Keywords: Dexmedetomidine; Intranasal spray formulation; Midazolam; Nasal atomization device.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with Ethical StandardsNo conflict of interest is present.The study was approved by Research and Ethical committee of Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University, Pune.All the patients included in the study were provided with subject information sheet. Patients signed the informed consent of the institute proforma as well as structured proforma of the study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Drug delivery in a fine mist form
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Nasal atomization devise used for delivering sedative agent in atomized form
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Showing plasma oxygen saturation (SpO2) in groups M and D preoperative, at sedation before administering LA, 10, 20, 30, 40 min after sedation and postoperative 10 min
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Showing mean pulse rate in groups M and D preoperative, at sedation before administering LA, 10, 20, 30, 40 min after sedation and postoperative 10 min
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Showing mean Systolic blood pressure (SBP) in Groups M and D preoperative, At sedation before administering LA, 10, 20, 30, 40 min after sedation and postoperative 10 min
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Showing mean Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in groups M and D preoperative, at sedation before administering LA, 10, 20, 30, 40 min after sedation and postoperative 10 min

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yealy MD. Lntranasal midazolam as a sedative for children during laceration repair. Am J Emerg Med. 1992;10:684–687. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(92)90190-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parworth LP. Propofol and fentanyl compared with midazolam and fentanyl during third molar surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;56:447–453. doi: 10.1016/S0278-2391(98)90710-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kucukyavuz Z. Effects of low-dose midazolam with propofol in patient-controlled sedation (PCS) for apicectomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;42:215–220. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2004.01.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garip H. A comparison of midazolam and midazolam with remifentanil for patient-controlled sedation during operations on third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;45:212–216. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2006.06.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kohjitani A. Oral midazolam for sedation in minor oral operations in children: a retrospective study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;46:330–331. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2007.07.203. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources