Meeting the Challenge: The National Cancer Institute's Central Institutional Review Board for Multi-Site Research
- PMID: 29384720
- PMCID: PMC5844669
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.9836
Meeting the Challenge: The National Cancer Institute's Central Institutional Review Board for Multi-Site Research
Abstract
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) issued a new policy that requires a single institutional review board (IRB) of record be used for all protocols funded by the NIH that are carried out at more than one site in the United States, effective January 2018. This policy affects several hundred clinical trials opened annually across the NIH. Limited data exist to compare the use of a single IRB to that of multiple local IRBs, so some institutions are resistant to or distrustful of single IRBs. Since 2001, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) has funded a central IRB (CIRB) that provides human patient reviews for its extensive national cancer clinical trials program. This paper presents data to show the adoption, efficiencies gained, and satisfaction of the CIRB among NCI trial networks and reviews key lessons gleaned from 16 years of experience that may be informative for others charged with implementation of the new NIH single-IRB policy.
Figures
Similar articles
-
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29. J Clin Oncol. 2003. PMID: 12721281
-
Transitioning to the National Institutes of Health single institutional review board model: Piloting the use of the Streamlined, Multi-site, Accelerated Resources for Trials IRB Reliance.Clin Trials. 2019 Jun;16(3):290-296. doi: 10.1177/1740774519832911. Epub 2019 Mar 13. Clin Trials. 2019. PMID: 30866676 Free PMC article.
-
Implementing a Central IRB Model in a Multicenter Research Network.Ethics Hum Res. 2019 May;41(3):23-28. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500016. Ethics Hum Res. 2019. PMID: 31108575 Free PMC article.
-
Reliance agreements and single IRB review of multisite research: Concerns of IRB members and staff.AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2018 Jul-Sep;9(3):164-172. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1510437. Epub 2018 Oct 4. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2018. PMID: 30285561 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Use of central institutional review boards for multicenter clinical trials in the United States: a review of the literature.Clin Trials. 2013 Aug;10(4):560-7. doi: 10.1177/1740774513484393. Epub 2013 May 10. Clin Trials. 2013. PMID: 23666951 Review.
Cited by
-
The impact of central IRB's on informed consent readability and trial adherence in SPRINT.Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Jul 6;15:100407. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100407. eCollection 2019 Sep. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019. PMID: 31338481 Free PMC article.
-
Adolescent and young adult enrollment to a National Cancer Institute-sponsored National Clinical Trials Network Research Group over 25 years.Cancer. 2021 Dec 15;127(24):4574-4584. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33855. Epub 2021 Aug 5. Cancer. 2021. PMID: 34351619 Free PMC article.
-
Economic analysis of a single institutional review board data exchange standard in multisite clinical studies.Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Nov;122:106953. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106953. Epub 2022 Oct 4. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022. PMID: 36202199 Free PMC article.
-
Improving research ethics review and governance can improve human health.J R Soc Med. 2021 Dec;114(12):556-562. doi: 10.1177/01410768211051711. Epub 2021 Nov 11. J R Soc Med. 2021. PMID: 34761994 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Transforming the Early Drug Development Paradigm at the National Cancer Institute: The Formation of NCI's Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network (ETCTN).Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Dec 1;25(23):6925-6931. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1754. Epub 2019 Aug 22. Clin Cancer Res. 2019. PMID: 31439585 Free PMC article.
References
-
- The Lancet Neurology : NeuroNEXT: accelerating drug development in neurology. Lancet Neurol 11:119, 2012 - PubMed
-
- National Conference on Alternative IRB Models: Optimizing human subject protection, 2006:1-53. (2017). In: National conference on alternative IRB models: Optimizing human subject protection. https://www.aamc.org/download/75240/data/irbconf06rpt.pdf.
-
- Pyle S.: Benefits of working with a central IRB. Improved efficiencies and enhanced human subject protections. Monitor (Charlottet):9-12, 2013
-
- Weschler J: Commentary- View from Washington-Central vs. Local: Rethinking IRBs-regulators and sponsors encourage alternative review models to fit a growing research enterprise. Appl Clin Trials 16:24-26, 2007
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources