Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec 1;35(2):97-108.

A radiographic study of the mandibular third molar root development in different ethnic groups

H M Liversidge  1 , K Peariasamy  2 , M O Folayan  3 , A O Adeniyi  4 , P I Ngom  5 , Y Mikami  6 , Y Shimada  7 , K Kuroe  8 , I F Tvete  9 , S I Kvaal  10
Affiliations

A radiographic study of the mandibular third molar root development in different ethnic groups

H M Liversidge et al. J Forensic Odontostomatol. .

Abstract

Background: The nature of differences in the timing of tooth formation between ethnic groups is important when estimating age.

Aim: To calculate age of transition of the mandibular third (M3) molar tooth stages from archived dental radiographs from sub-Saharan Africa, Malaysia, Japan and two groups from London UK (Whites and Bangladeshi).

Materials and methods: The number of radiographs was 4555 (2028 males, 2527 females) with an age range 10-25 years. The left M3 was staged into Moorrees stages. A probit model was fitted to calculate mean ages for transitions between stages for males and females and each ethnic group separately. The estimated age distributions given each M3 stage was calculated. To assess differences in timing of M3 between ethnic groups, three models were proposed: a separate model for each ethnic group, a joint model and a third model combining some aspects across groups. The best model fit was tested using Bayesian and Akaikes information criteria (BIC and AIC) and log likelihood ratio test.

Results: Differences in mean ages of M3 root stages were found between ethnic groups, however all groups showed large standard deviation values. The AIC and log likelihood ratio test indicated that a separate model for each ethnic group was best. Small differences were also noted between timing of M3 between males and females, with the exception of the Malaysian group. These findings suggests that features of a reference data set (wide age range and uniform age distribution) and a Bayesian statistical approach are more important than population specific convenience samples to estimate age of an individual using M3.

Conclusion: Some group differences were evident in M3 timing, however, this has some impact on the confidence interval of estimated age in females and little impact in males because of the large variation in age.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Molar crown and root stages after Moorrees. (Ri = initial root, Rcl = root cleft, R¼ = root quarter, R½ = root half, R¾ = root three quarters, Rc = root complete, A½ = apex half closed, Ac = apex closed).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Third molar root stage versus chronological age in years in males. Stages see Figure 1.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Third molar root stage versus chronological age in years in females. Stages see Figure 1.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Estimated age density plots for M3 stages in males (left) and females (right). (R¾ = root three quarters, Rc = root complete, A½ = apex half closed)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Liversidge HM. Dentition. In: Cunningham C, Scheuer L, Black S (eds.). Developmental Juvenile Osteology. 2nd ed. Amsterdam, Netherland. Academic Press/Elsevier. 2016. 149-76.
    1. Moorrees CFA, Fanning EA, Hunt EE. Age variation of formation stages for ten permanent teeth. J Dent Res. 1963;42:1490–502. 10.1177/00220345630420062701 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol. 1973;45:211–27. - PubMed
    1. Levesque GY, Demirjian A, Tanguay R. Sexual dimorphism in the development, emergence, and agenesis of the mandibular third molar. J Dent Res. 1981;60:1735–41. 10.1177/00220345810600100201 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harris EF, McKee JH. Tooth mineralization standards for blacks and whites from the middle southern United States. J Forensic Sci. 1990;35:859–72. 10.1520/JFS12898J - DOI - PubMed