Improving the accuracy of blood pressure measurement: the influence of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol (ESH-IP) for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices and future perspectives
- PMID: 29384984
- DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001635
Improving the accuracy of blood pressure measurement: the influence of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol (ESH-IP) for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices and future perspectives
Abstract
Introduction: The European Society of Hypertension (ESH) International Protocol (ESH-IP) for the validation of blood pressure (BP) measuring devices was published in 2002, with the main objective of simplifying the validation procedures, so that more BP monitors would be subjected to independent validation. This article provides an overview of the international impact of the ESH-IP and of the lessons learned from its use, to be able to justify further developments in validation protocols.
Methods: A review of published (PubMed) validation studies from 2002 to 2017 was performed.
Results: One hundred and seventy-seven validation studies using the ESH-IP, 59 using the British Hypertension Society protocol, 46 using the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) standard and 23 using the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard were identified. Lists of validated office-clinic, home and ambulatory BP monitors are provided. Of the ESH-IP studies, 93% tested oscillometric devices, 80% upper arm, 71% home, 25% office and 7% ambulatory monitors (some had more than one function).
Conclusion: The original goal of the ESH-IP has been fulfilled in that in the last decade the number of published validation studies has more than doubled. It is now recognized that the provision of accurate devices would be best served by having a universal protocol. An international initiative has been put in place by AAMI, ESH and ISO experts aiming to reach consensus for a universal validation protocol to be accepted worldwide, which will allow a more thorough evaluation of the accuracy and performance of future BP monitors.
Similar articles
-
A universal standard for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) Collaboration Statement.J Hypertens. 2018 Mar;36(3):472-478. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001634. J Hypertens. 2018. PMID: 29384983 Free PMC article.
-
European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for the validation of blood pressure monitors: a critical review of its application and rationale for revision.Blood Press Monit. 2010 Feb;15(1):39-48. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3283360eaf. Blood Press Monit. 2010. PMID: 20087174
-
Validation of the RBP-9801 oscillometric blood pressure monitor in the general population according to the association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/ International Organization for Standardization Universal Standard.J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2024 Jun;26(6):703-707. doi: 10.1111/jch.14812. Epub 2024 Apr 22. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2024. PMID: 38650108 Free PMC article.
-
A Universal Standard for the Validation of Blood Pressure Measuring Devices: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) Collaboration Statement.Hypertension. 2018 Mar;71(3):368-374. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10237. Epub 2018 Jan 31. Hypertension. 2018. PMID: 29386350 Review.
-
Validation protocols for blood pressure-measuring devices: status quo and development needs.Blood Press Monit. 2016 Feb;21(1):1-8. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000150. Blood Press Monit. 2016. PMID: 26398010 Review.
Cited by
-
Validations of Blood Pressure Measuring Devices Using Recognized Protocols.J Pers Med. 2022 Dec 21;13(1):9. doi: 10.3390/jpm13010009. J Pers Med. 2022. PMID: 36675670 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Automated blood pressure measuring devices: how are they clinically validated for accuracy?J Hum Hypertens. 2023 Feb;37(2):101-107. doi: 10.1038/s41371-022-00761-2. Epub 2022 Oct 11. J Hum Hypertens. 2023. PMID: 36220909 Review.
-
Pulse pressure findings following upper cervical care: a practice-based observational study.J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2019 Apr;63(1):51-58. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2019. PMID: 31057178 Free PMC article.
-
[Lancet Commission on Hypertension Group position statement on the global improvement of accuracy standards for devices that measure blood pressurePosicionamento do Grupo da Lancet Commission on Hypertension sobre a melhoria global dos padrões de acurácia para aparelhos que medem a pressão arterial].Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2020 Mar 1;44:e21. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2020.21. eCollection 2020. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2020. PMID: 32117468 Free PMC article. Spanish.
-
Lancet Commission on Hypertension group position statement on the global improvement of accuracy standards for devices that measure blood pressure.J Hypertens. 2020 Jan;38(1):21-29. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002246. J Hypertens. 2020. PMID: 31790375 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical