Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 29;8(1):44-53.
doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx044.

Parental attitudes and expectations towards receiving genomic test results in healthy children

Alanna Kulchak Rahm  1 , Lindsay Bailey  1 , Kara Fultz  1   2 , Audrey Fan  1   3 , Janet L Williams  1 , Adam Buchanan  1 , F Daniel Davis  1 , Michael F Murray  1 , Marc S Williams  1
Affiliations

Parental attitudes and expectations towards receiving genomic test results in healthy children

Alanna Kulchak Rahm et al. Transl Behav Med. .

Abstract

Little evidence is available to guide returning genomic results in children without medical indication for sequencing. Professional guidelines for returning information on adult-onset conditions are conflicting. The goal of this study was to provide preliminary information on parental attitudes and expectations about returning medically actionable genomic results in children who have been sequenced as part of a population biobank.Four focus groups of parents with a child enrolled in a population biobank were conducted. A deliberative engagement format included education about professional guidelines and ethical issues around returning results to children. Parents were presented two scenarios where their healthy child has a pathogenic variant for: (a) a medically actionable childhood condition; (b) a hereditary cancer syndrome with no medical management until adulthood. Thematic analysis was conducted on verbatim transcripts. Regardless of the scenario, parents stated that the genomic information was important, was like other unexpected medical information, and disclosure should be tailored to the child's age and result. Parents wanted the results in their child's medical record. Reasons for learning adult-onset results in their healthy children included to prepare their child for necessary medical action in adulthood. Parents also provided suggestions for program design. This preliminary evidence suggests that parents desire genomic results and expect to use this information to protect their child's health. More empirical research on psychosocial adjustment to such information with continued engagement of parents and children is needed to further inform how to best support families in the communication and use of genomic information.

Keywords: Adult-onset conditions; Children; Genetic testing; Genomics; Parental Attitudes; Qualitative methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Analytic Framework for reviewing domains by scenario and child age.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Botkin JR, Belmont JW, Berg JS et al. . Points to consider: ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;97(1):6–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Committee on Bioethics, Committee on Genetics, and The American College Of Medical Genetics and Genomics Social, Ethical, and Legal Issues Committee. Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children. Pediatrics. 2013;131(3):620–622. - PubMed
    1. Hardart GE, Chung WK. Genetic testing of children for diseases that have onset in adulthood: the limits of family interests. Pediatrics. 2014; 134(suppl 2):S104–S110. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Green RC, Berg JS, Grody WW et al. ; American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genet Med. 2013;15(7):565–574. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kalia SS, Adelman K, Bale SJ et al. . Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Genet Med. 2017;19(2): 249–255. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms