Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 31;19(1):108.
doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4488-1.

Transcriptome profiling of lentil (Lens culinaris) through the first 24 hours of Ascochyta lentis infection reveals key defence response genes

Mahsa Khorramdelazad  1 , Ido Bar  2 , Paul Whatmore  3   4 , Gabrielle Smetham  5 , Vijay Bhaaskaria  6 , Yuedong Yang  7 , Shahla Hosseini Bai  1 , Nitin Mantri  3   4 , Yaoqi Zhou  7 , Rebecca Ford  1
Affiliations

Transcriptome profiling of lentil (Lens culinaris) through the first 24 hours of Ascochyta lentis infection reveals key defence response genes

Mahsa Khorramdelazad et al. BMC Genomics. .

Abstract

Background: Ascochyta blight, caused by the fungus Ascochyta lentis, is one of the most destructive lentil diseases worldwide, resulting in over $16 million AUD annual loss in Australia alone. The use of resistant cultivars is currently considered the most effective and environmentally sustainable strategy to control this disease. However, little is known about the genes and molecular mechanisms underlying lentil resistance against A. lentis.

Results: To uncover the genetic basis of lentil resistance to A. lentis, differentially expressed genes were profiled in lentil plants during the early stages of A. lentis infection. The resistant 'ILL7537' and susceptible 'ILL6002' lentil genotypes were examined at 2, 6, and 24 h post inoculation utilising high throughput RNA-Sequencing. Genotype and time-dependent differential expression analysis identified genes which play key roles in several functions of the defence response: fungal elicitors recognition and early signalling; structural response; biochemical response; transcription regulators; hypersensitive reaction and cell death; and systemic acquired resistance. Overall, the resistant genotype displayed an earlier and faster detection and signalling response to the A. lentis infection and demonstrated higher expression levels of structural defence-related genes.

Conclusions: This study presents a first-time defence-related transcriptome of lentil to A. lentis, including a comprehensive characterisation of the molecular mechanism through which defence against A. lentis is induced in the resistant lentil genotype.

Keywords: Ascochyta lentis; De novo assembly; Defence response; Fabaceae; Lens culinaris; Lentil; RNA sequencing and transcriptome analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Plants used in this study were grown from seeds sourced from the University of Melbourne collection. Sampling of plant material was performed in compliance with institutional guidelines. No further approvals, licences or permissions were required since no sampling was conducted from wild and/or native flora.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Experimental design of the Ascochyta lentis resistant (ILL7537) and susceptible (ILL6002) lentil genotypes used for RNA extraction
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Bioinformatics flowchart of tools and methods used to process and analyse the RNA-Sequencing data and produce the transcriptome
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Expression-dependant N50 (ExN50), as calculated against a fraction of the total expressed data (Ex). ExN50 at the point of assembly saturation (96%) and traditional N50 are highlighted
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Taxonomy distribution of significant* Blast matches. Annotation was considered as significant with a BitScore >100, pie slices are calculated in logarithmic scale to assist in visualisation
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Principal component analysis of the variance-stabilized estimated raw counts. Samples are categorized by Genotype (as marker shapes) and Hours post inoculation (HPI, marker colour)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
The number of unique and common differentially expressed genes between the subgroups of inoculated samples (time post inoculation and genotype). Comparison of inoculated resistant vs. susceptible genotypes at each time point (2 hpi, 6 hpi and 24 hpi, a); and within the inoculated resistant (ILL7537) genotype samples between the different time points (b). Circle area is plotted to scale (Euler diagram) when geometrically possible
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis, based on over-expressed DE genes at each time point (2, 6, and 24 hpi) in the resistant lentil genotype ILL7537. GO pathway enrichment at 2 and 6 hpi (a) and 6 and 24 hpi (b); KEGG pathway enrichment at 2 and 6 hpi (c) and 6 and 24 hpi (d)
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Expression levels of selected genes with exceptional DE trends in the earlier stages of the defence response to A. lentis in ILL7537 and ILL6002 over 2, 6, and 24 hpi. Expression levels of the following genes are presented: CDPK, ERF and LRR-RK, with PP2A and MYB49 as examples of stable reference genes (a); Delta (12)-FAD, EXO70A1 and XTH (b); PR genes and UPL-BOI (c); ARP, PGIP and PMEI (d). A full line represents the expression level in the resistant genotype ILL7537 and the dashed line represents the expression level of the gene in the susceptible genotype ILL6002. Y-axis is in logarithmic scale, error bars represent standard error values between replicates
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Expression levels of selected genes with exceptional DE trends in the earlier stages of the defence response to A. lentis in ILL7537 and ILL6002 over 2, 6, and 24 hpi. Expression levels of the following genes are presented: R-S/T-K1, RING/U-box and SAG (a); R-S/T-K1, RING/U-box and SAG (b); DELLA, GID1, NB-ARC and UPL-SHPRH (c). A full line represents the expression level in the resistant genotype ILL7537 and the dashed line represents the expression level of the gene in the susceptible genotype ILL6002. Y-axis is in logarithmic scale, error bars represent standard error values between replicates
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Expression ratios between resistant (ILL7537) and susceptible (ILL6002) lentil genotypes, measured by RT-qPCR. Expression ratios of selected defence-related genes at 2, 6, and 24 hpi (a, b, c, respectively). Asterisks denote statistic significance (DE ≠ 1), with the following p-values: * <0.05, ** <0.01, *** <0.005
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Defence-related molecules involved in response of lentil to A. lentis during the first 24 h
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. FAOSTAT . Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) statistical yearbook 2014. Statistical yearbook. Rome: Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations; 2014.
    1. Nene YL, Hanounik SB, Qureshi SH, Sen B. Fungal and bacterial foliar diseases of pea, lentil, faba bean and chickpea. In: Summerfield RJE, editor. World Crops: Cool Season Food Legumes: A Global Perspective of the Problems and Prospects for Crop Improvement in Pea, Lentil, Faba Bean and Chickpea. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 1988.
    1. Taylor PWJ, Ford R. Diagnostics, genetic diversity and pathogenic variation of ascochyta blight of cool season food and feed legumes. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2007;119(1):127–33. doi: 10.1007/s10658-007-9177-x. - DOI
    1. Murray GM, Brennan JP. The Current and Potential Costs from Diseases of Pulse Crops in Australia. Canberra: Grains Research and Development Corporation; 2012.
    1. Galloway J, MacLeod WJ, Lindbeck KD. Formation of Didymella lentis, the teleomorph of Ascochyta lentis, on lentil stubble in the field in Victoria and Western Australia. Australas Plant Pathol. 2004;33(3):449–50. doi: 10.1071/AP04033. - DOI

Publication types