Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 31;18(1):72.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2866-7.

Integrating community-based health promotion programs and primary care: a mixed methods analysis of feasibility

Affiliations

Integrating community-based health promotion programs and primary care: a mixed methods analysis of feasibility

Aaron L Leppin et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Implementation of evidence-based programs (EBPs) for disease self-management and prevention is a policy priority. It is challenging to implement EBPs offered in community settings and to integrate them with healthcare. We sought to understand, categorize, and richly describe key challenges and opportunities related to integrating EBPs into routine primary care practice in the United States.

Methods: As part of a parent, participatory action research project, we conducted a mixed methods evaluation guided by the PRECEDE implementation planning model in an 11-county region of Southeast Minnesota. Our community-partnered research team interviewed and surveyed 15 and 190 primary care clinicians and 15 and 88 non-clinician stakeholders, respectively. We coded interviews according to pre-defined PRECEDE factors and by participant type and searched for emerging themes. We then categorized survey items-before looking at participant responses-according to their ability to generate further evidence supporting the PRECEDE factors and emerging themes. We statistically summarized data within and across responder groups. When consistent, we merged these with qualitative insight.

Results: The themes we found, "Two Systems, Two Worlds," "Not My Job," and "Seeing is Believing," highlighted the disparate nature of prescribed activities that different stakeholders do to contribute to health. For instance, primary care clinicians felt pressured to focus on activities of diagnosis and treatment and did not imagine ways in which EBPs could contribute to either. Quantitative analyses supported aspects of all three themes, highlighting clinicians' limited trust in community-placed activities, and the need for tailored education and system and policy-level changes to support their integration with primary care.

Conclusions: Primary care and community-based programs exist in disconnected worlds. Without urgent and intentional efforts to bridge well-care and sick-care, interventions that support people's efforts to be and stay well in their communities will remain outside of-if not at odds with-healthcare.

Keywords: CBPR; Chronic disease management; Chronic disease self-management program; Clinic-community linkages; Community-based participatory research; Evidence-based programs; Implementation; Mixed methods; Primary care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors’ information

ALL is a physician and implementation scientist in the Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit at Mayo Clinic.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board through its Office of Community Engagement in Research under exempt status. All participants gave consent to participate in this study. The reference number for the study is: 15–002587-03

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study overview
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Summary of PRECEDE barriers identified, emergent themes, and implementation strategies of potential value

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ward BW, Schiller JS, Goodman RA. Multiple chronic conditions among US adults: a 2012 update. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014;11:E62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA. 2002;288(19):2469–2475. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.19.2469. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Norris SL, Engelgau MM, Narayan KV. Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(3):561–587. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.3.561. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gallant MP. The influence of social support on chronic illness self-management: a review and directions for research. Health Educ Behav. 2003;30(2):170–195. doi: 10.1177/1090198102251030. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cunningham PJ. Chronic burdens: the persistently high out-of-pocket health care expenses faced by many Americans with chronic conditions. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) 2009;63:1–14. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms