Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan;74(1):38-43.
doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 May 31.

Effect of wrist cooling on aerobic and anaerobic performance in elite sportsmen

Affiliations

Effect of wrist cooling on aerobic and anaerobic performance in elite sportsmen

Anup Krishnan et al. Med J Armed Forces India. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Body cooling has been used to increase sporting performance and enhance recovery. Several studies have reported improvement in exercise capacities using forearm and hand cooling or only hand cooling. Wrist cooling has emerged as a portable light weight solution for precooling prior to sporting activity. The Astrand test for aerobic performance and the Wingate test for anaerobic performance are reliable and accurate tests for performance assessment. This study conducted on elite Indian athletes analyses the effects of wrist precooling on aerobic and anaerobic performance as tested by the Astrand test and the Wingate test before and after wrist precooling.

Methods: 67 elite sportsmen were administered Wingate and Astrand test under standardised conditions with and without wrist precooling using a wrist cooling device (dhamaSPORT). Paired t-test was applied to study effect on aerobic [VO2 (ml/min/kg)] and anaerobic performance [peak power (W/kg) and average power (W/kg)] and Cohen's d was used to calculate effect size of wrist precooling.

Results: After wrist precooling, significant increase of 0.22 (p = 0.014, 95% CI: 0.047, 0.398) in peak power (W/kg) and 0.22 (p < 0.0001, 95% CI: 0.142, 0.291) was observed in average power (W/kg). Although, an increase of 1.38 (p = 0.097, 95% CI: -0.225, 3.012) was observed in VO2 (ml/min/kg), wrist precooling was not significantly effective in aerobic performance. Wrist cooling effect size was smaller in VO2 (Cohen's d = 0.21), peak power (Cohen's d = 0.31) and it was larger in average power (Cohen's d = 0.71).

Conclusion: Results show wrist precooling significantly improves anaerobic than aerobic performance of elite sportsmen.

Keywords: Aerobic performance; Anaerobic performance; Elite sportsmen; Wrist cooling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Photo 1
Photo 1
The dhamaSPORT wrist cooling device.
Photo 2
Photo 2
Wearing technique.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McArdle W.D., Katch F.I., Katch V.L. 8th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2015. Exercise Physiology Nutrition, Energy and human performance; pp. 615–637.
    1. Astrand P.O., Rodahl K., Dahl H.A., Strømme S.B. 4th ed. Human Kinetics; 2003. Textbook of Work Physiology Physiological Basis of Exercise.
    1. Armstrong L.E. 1st ed. Human Kinetics; 2000. Performance in Extreme Environments.
    1. Martin D.E. Strategies for optimizing marathon. Sports Med. 2007;37(4–5):324–327. - PubMed
    1. Perirad J. Prolonged exercise in heat. Sports Med J ASPETAR. 2013:10–15.

LinkOut - more resources