A comparative evaluation of sealing ability of four root end filling materials using fluid filtration method: An in vitro study
- PMID: 29386776
- PMCID: PMC5767823
- DOI: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_122_17
A comparative evaluation of sealing ability of four root end filling materials using fluid filtration method: An in vitro study
Erratum in
-
Erratum: A comparative evaluation of sealing ability of four root end filling materials using fluid filtration method: An in vitro study.J Conserv Dent. 2017 Nov-Dec;20(6):482. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.223205. J Conserv Dent. 2017. PMID: 29431158 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Aim of the study: The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the sealing ability of four root end filling materials mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)-Plus, Biodentine, MTA (MTA Angelus) and glass ionomer cement (GIC) using fluid filtration method.
Materials and methods: Forty-four extracted, human single-rooted teeth were collected. The crown of each tooth was decoronated 2 mm above the cementoenamel junction. Canals were negotiated, instrumented, obturated using lateral compaction method. The access cavities were sealed with Cavit. Root end resection and apical root end cavity preparations of 4 mm were made in each specimen. The selected roots were then randomly divided into four groups (n = 11) and restored as follows. Group 1 - GIC, Group 2 - MTA (MTA Angelus), Group 3 - Biodentine, and Group 4 - MTA Plus. The apical microleakage of each specimen was assessed using fluid filtration method at 72 h, 1 month and 3 months. Microleakage in each specimen was recorded in mm (millimeter) and converted to μl/min/cm H2O.
Results: MTA Angelus showed least microleakage followed by Biodentine and MTA Plus. Least sealing ability was seen with GIC. There was statistically significant difference between all the materials at various time intervals.
Conclusion: MTA Angelus showed superior sealing ability as a retrograde filling material followed by Biodentine and MTA Plus.
Keywords: Biodentine; fluid filtration method; glass ionomer cement; mineral trioxide aggregate angelus; mineral trioxide aggregate plus; root end filling.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of the sealing ability amongst orthograde apical plugs of mineral trioxide aggregate plus, mineral trioxide aggregate repair HP, and Biodentine after root resection: a bacterial leakage study.Odontology. 2024 Apr;112(2):364-371. doi: 10.1007/s10266-023-00847-4. Epub 2023 Aug 26. Odontology. 2024. PMID: 37632561
-
Sealing Ability of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Biodentine and Glass Ionomer as Root-End Materials: A Question of Choice.Acta Med Acad. 2020 Dec;49(3):232-239. doi: 10.5644/ama2006-124.312. Acta Med Acad. 2020. PMID: 33781066
-
Comparative evaluation of the sealing ability of filling materials on root end cavities treated with smear layer removing agents: A confocal laser scanning microscopic study.J Conserv Dent. 2019 Sep-Oct;22(5):495-499. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_2_19. Epub 2020 Aug 4. J Conserv Dent. 2019. PMID: 33082669 Free PMC article.
-
Biocompatibility and sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and biodentine as root-end filling material: A systematic review.J Conserv Dent. 2018 Jan-Feb;21(1):10-15. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_45_17. J Conserv Dent. 2018. PMID: 29628640 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Washout Resistance of Bioactive Root-End Filling Materials-A Systematic Review.J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 3;14(7):2446. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072446. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40217897 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of microleakage of mineral trioxide aggregate and biodentine as apical barriers in simulated young permanent teeth.BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):1100. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04817-2. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 39285402 Free PMC article.
-
Retrograde filling material in periapical surgery: a systematic review.Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2021 Jul 1;26(4):e422-e429. doi: 10.4317/medoral.24262. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2021. PMID: 33340080 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative evaluation of apical microleakage of mineral trioxide aggregate, Biodentine, and Bio-C Repair as root-end filling materials using dye extraction method: An in vitro study.J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Dec;27(12):1305-1309. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_616_24. Epub 2024 Dec 10. J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024. PMID: 39959012 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) and maleic acid as root-end conditioners on the sealing ability of ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and Biodentine as root-end filling materials: An in vitro study.J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2025 Mar 31;19(1):29-32. doi: 10.34172/joddd.025.41232. eCollection 2025 Mar. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2025. PMID: 40464030 Free PMC article.
-
Postoperative Outcomes in Surgical Endodontic Treatment Using Various Root-End Filling Materials for Immature Root Apices.Cureus. 2025 Mar 18;17(3):e80801. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80801. eCollection 2025 Mar. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40255706 Free PMC article.
References
-
- HL S, Briget B. A comparative evaluation of the sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate, high copper silver amalgam, conventional glass ionomer cement, and glass cermet as root-end filling materials by dye penetration method. J Int Oral Health. 2011;3:31–5.
-
- El Alasser M, Diab A, El Bagtady Y. A comparative study of the sealing ability of different root-end filling materials an in-vitro study. Cairo Dent J. 2009;25:353–9.
-
- Vasudev SK, Goel BR, Tyagi S. Root end filling materials – A Review. Endodontology. 2003;15:12–8.
-
- Torabinejad M, Rastegar AF, Kettering JD, Pitt Ford TR. Bacterial leakage of mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end filling material. J Endod. 1995;21:109–12. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials