A comparative evaluation of sealing ability of four root end filling materials using fluid filtration method: An in vitro study
- PMID: 29386776
- PMCID: PMC5767823
- DOI: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_122_17
A comparative evaluation of sealing ability of four root end filling materials using fluid filtration method: An in vitro study
Erratum in
-
Erratum: A comparative evaluation of sealing ability of four root end filling materials using fluid filtration method: An in vitro study.J Conserv Dent. 2017 Nov-Dec;20(6):482. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.223205. J Conserv Dent. 2017. PMID: 29431158 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Aim of the study: The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the sealing ability of four root end filling materials mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)-Plus, Biodentine, MTA (MTA Angelus) and glass ionomer cement (GIC) using fluid filtration method.
Materials and methods: Forty-four extracted, human single-rooted teeth were collected. The crown of each tooth was decoronated 2 mm above the cementoenamel junction. Canals were negotiated, instrumented, obturated using lateral compaction method. The access cavities were sealed with Cavit. Root end resection and apical root end cavity preparations of 4 mm were made in each specimen. The selected roots were then randomly divided into four groups (n = 11) and restored as follows. Group 1 - GIC, Group 2 - MTA (MTA Angelus), Group 3 - Biodentine, and Group 4 - MTA Plus. The apical microleakage of each specimen was assessed using fluid filtration method at 72 h, 1 month and 3 months. Microleakage in each specimen was recorded in mm (millimeter) and converted to μl/min/cm H2O.
Results: MTA Angelus showed least microleakage followed by Biodentine and MTA Plus. Least sealing ability was seen with GIC. There was statistically significant difference between all the materials at various time intervals.
Conclusion: MTA Angelus showed superior sealing ability as a retrograde filling material followed by Biodentine and MTA Plus.
Keywords: Biodentine; fluid filtration method; glass ionomer cement; mineral trioxide aggregate angelus; mineral trioxide aggregate plus; root end filling.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- HL S, Briget B. A comparative evaluation of the sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate, high copper silver amalgam, conventional glass ionomer cement, and glass cermet as root-end filling materials by dye penetration method. J Int Oral Health. 2011;3:31–5.
-
- El Alasser M, Diab A, El Bagtady Y. A comparative study of the sealing ability of different root-end filling materials an in-vitro study. Cairo Dent J. 2009;25:353–9.
-
- Vasudev SK, Goel BR, Tyagi S. Root end filling materials – A Review. Endodontology. 2003;15:12–8.
-
- Torabinejad M, Rastegar AF, Kettering JD, Pitt Ford TR. Bacterial leakage of mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end filling material. J Endod. 1995;21:109–12. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
