Comparative evaluation of three different rotary instrumentation systems for removal of gutta-percha from root canal during endodontic retreatment: An in vitro study
- PMID: 29386777
- PMCID: PMC5767824
- DOI: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_132_17
Comparative evaluation of three different rotary instrumentation systems for removal of gutta-percha from root canal during endodontic retreatment: An in vitro study
Abstract
Context: Endodontic retreatment is performed in teeth with endodontic failures. The main goal of retreatment is cleaning and shaping of the root canal with removal of old root filling material. Hand instruments and rotary instruments are mainly used for removing this filling material.
Aim of study: To compare the relative efficacy of three rotary instrumentation systems for removal of gutta-percha from root canal during endodontic retreatment.
Objective of study: To find out which NiTi system is more efficacious in retreatment and to check out the efficacy of retreatment with and without use of solvent.
Materials and methods: Sixty freshly extracted, single-rooted human mandibular premolars were instrumented with K-files, and each root canal was filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus (Dentsply Detrey, Konstanz, Germany) sealer using lateral compaction. Specimens were then divided into three experimental groups with twenty specimens each. Groups were then subdivided into ten specimens each. Groups were then retreated either with or without solvent. The removal of gutta-percha was performed using ProTaper retreatment files, Mtwo retreatment files, and R-Endo files after 2 weeks. The amount of root canal filling material remnant in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds was measured using stereomicroscope and computer image analysis program.
Statistical analysis used: Data were evaluated statistically using analysis of variance.
Results: ProTaper group was found to have less remnant filling material as compared to the other groups in coronal and middle thirds, but a significant difference was observed between ProTaper and Mtwo and Mtwo and R-Endo in the nonsolvent groups (P < 0.05). Mtwo group demonstrated less amount of remaining filling material in the nonsolvent group.
Conclusions: Both nickel-titanium systems and ProTaper and Mtwo retreatment file systems, were found to be effective in the removal of root canal filling material. However, complete removal of gutta-percha from root canals did not occur with any of the experimental groups.
Keywords: Endodontic retreatment; gutta-percha; obturation; rotary instrumentation.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
An In Vitro Study of Gutta Percha Removal Commencing from the Root Canal Undergoing Endodontic Retreatment using Different Rotary Instrumentation Systems.J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022 Jul;14(Suppl 1):S522-S525. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_83_22. Epub 2022 Jul 13. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022. PMID: 36110743 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of three rotary NiTi instruments in removing gutta-percha from root canals.Int Endod J. 2008 Mar;41(3):191-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01335.x. Epub 2007 Dec 10. Int Endod J. 2008. PMID: 18081812 Clinical Trial.
-
The Comparative Efficacy of Different Files in The Removal of Different Sealers in Simulated Root Canal Retreatment- An In-vitro Study.J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 May;10(5):ZC130-3. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17731.7845. Epub 2016 May 1. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016. PMID: 27437347 Free PMC article.
-
The use of solvents for gutta-percha dissolution/removal during endodontic retreatments: A scoping review.J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2021 Jun;109(6):890-901. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34753. Epub 2020 Nov 6. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2021. PMID: 33155731
-
Assessment of Root Canal Filling Removal Effectiveness Using Micro-computed Tomography: A Systematic Review.J Endod. 2017 Apr;43(4):520-526. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.12.008. Epub 2017 Feb 14. J Endod. 2017. PMID: 28214018
Cited by
-
Retreatment of XP-endo Shaper and R-Endo files in curved root canals.BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jan 24;23(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02735-3. BMC Oral Health. 2023. PMID: 36694152 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of Reciprocating Instruments in Retreatment of Bioactive and Resin-Based Root Canal Sealers.Acta Stomatol Croat. 2022 Dec;56(4):338-350. doi: 10.15644/asc56/4/1. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2022. PMID: 36713274 Free PMC article.
-
Maxillary Premolars with Four Canals: Case Series.Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Dec 2;9(12):757. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9120757. Bioengineering (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36550963 Free PMC article.
-
Retreatability of NeoSEALER Flo obturated with warm vertical compaction versus single-cone technique using two different retreatment systems.J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Mar;27(3):286-292. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_314_23. Epub 2024 Mar 6. J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024. PMID: 38634031 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of Endodontic Files in Root Canal Retreatment: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.J Funct Biomater. 2025 Aug 14;16(8):293. doi: 10.3390/jfb16080293. J Funct Biomater. 2025. PMID: 40863313 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Torabinejad M. Principles and Practice of Endodontics. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2002. Orthograde retreatment.
-
- Stabholz A, Friedman S. Endodontic retreatment – Case selection and technique. Part 2: Treatment planning for retreatment. J Endod. 1988;14:607–14. - PubMed
-
- Schirrmeister JF, Wrbas KT, Meyer KM, Altenburger MJ, Hellwig E. Efficacy of different rotary instruments for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment. J Endod. 2006;32:469–72. - PubMed
-
- Betti LV, Bramante CM. Quantec SC rotary instruments versus hand files for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment. Int Endod J. 2001;34:514–9. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials