A comparison of the expected and actual pain experienced by women during insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device
- PMID: 29386921
- PMCID: PMC5683140
- DOI: 10.2147/OAJC.S74624
A comparison of the expected and actual pain experienced by women during insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device
Abstract
Objective: To compare the expected and actual pain experienced with the insertion of intrauterine contraception in women, and to determine whether either of these are related to their personal circumstances, or affected their satisfaction with the procedure.
Design: A convenience sample of 89 women aged 15-50 years attending a sexual health clinic for same day intrauterine contraception insertion were given a questionnaire that they completed following the procedure. The women were asked to rate their expectation of pain prior to insertion and to rate the actual pain they experienced immediately after insertion, on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being severe pain. Information on the women's circumstances and their level of satisfaction with the procedure was also obtained.
Results: Overall, the median actual pain experienced by women during insertion (4) was significantly lower than the expected pain median (6) (P<0.001). For those women who had not had a previous vaginal delivery, actual pain was significantly higher compared with women who had had a previous vaginal delivery (median [interquartile range]: 6 [3.5-7.5] and 3 [1-5], P<0.001, respectively), but there was no significant difference between expected and actual pain experiences. In women who had a previous vaginal delivery, actual pain was much lower than expected (P<0.001). Neither actual nor expected pain experiences were linked to any other sociodemographic reproductive health or service use factors.
Conclusion: All women had a high expectation of pain prior to IUD insertion, but for those who had had a previous vaginal delivery, this was significantly greater than that actually experienced. Satisfaction levels overall were high. Counseling of women should take into account their expected pain prior to IUD insertion and consideration should be given to alternative and additional methods of pain relief in women who have not had a previous vaginal delivery.
Keywords: IUD; IUD insertion; expected pain.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Similar articles
-
Differing Approaches to Pain Management for Intrauterine Device Insertion and Maintenance: A Scoping Review.Cureus. 2024 Mar 8;16(3):e55785. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55785. eCollection 2024 Mar. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38586685 Free PMC article.
-
Women's experiences with immediate postpartum intrauterine device insertion: a mixed-methods study.Contraception. 2018 Mar;97(3):219-226. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Oct 26. Contraception. 2018. PMID: 29080696
-
Vaginal misoprostol prior to intrauterine device insertion in women delivered only by elective cesarean section: a randomized double-blind clinical trial.Contraception. 2017 Jun;95(6):538-543. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 11. Contraception. 2017. PMID: 28088498 Clinical Trial.
-
Self-administrated vaginal 2% lidocaine in-situ gel for pain relief during copper intrauterine device insertion in women with previous caesarean delivery only: a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2021 Apr;26(2):132-138. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2020.1868427. Epub 2021 Feb 4. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2021. Retraction in: Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2023 Oct;28(5):283. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2023.2243186. PMID: 33539256 Retracted. Clinical Trial.
-
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26606712 English, French.
Cited by
-
Use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Pain Management During Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Case Series.Cureus. 2024 Sep 13;16(9):e69324. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69324. eCollection 2024 Sep. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39398805 Free PMC article.
-
The use of LNG-IUS-19.5 mg in daily gynecological routine practice in Germany: data from the Kyleena™ Satisfaction Study (KYSS).Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 May;309(5):2021-2030. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07421-5. Epub 2024 Feb 29. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024. PMID: 38421421 Free PMC article.
-
Differing Approaches to Pain Management for Intrauterine Device Insertion and Maintenance: A Scoping Review.Cureus. 2024 Mar 8;16(3):e55785. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55785. eCollection 2024 Mar. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38586685 Free PMC article.
References
-
- National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Long-acting Reversible Contraception: The Effective and Appropriate Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception. London, UK: RCOG Press; 2005. [Accessed December 28, 2014]. (NICE Clinical Guidelines, No 30). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK51051/ - PubMed
-
- Bayer LL, Jensen JT, Li H, Nichols MD, Bednarek PH. Adolescent experience with intrauterine device insertion and use: a retrospective cohort study. Contraception. 2012;86(5):443–451. - PubMed
-
- Brockmeyer A, Kishen M, Webb A. Experience of IUD/IUS insertions and clinical performance in nulliparous women – a pilot study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2008;13(3):248–254. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources