Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Apr 11:7:53-67.
doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S98817. eCollection 2016.

Postpartum family planning: current evidence on successful interventions

Affiliations
Review

Postpartum family planning: current evidence on successful interventions

Cassandra Blazer et al. Open Access J Contracept. .

Abstract

We reviewed existing evidence of the efficacy of postpartum family planning interventions targeting women in the 12 months postpartum period in low- and middle-income countries. We searched for studies from January 1, 2004 to September 19, 2015, using the US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations to assess evidence quality. Our search resulted in 26 studies: 11 based in sub-Saharan Africa, six in the Middle East and North Africa, and nine in Asia. Twenty of the included studies assessed health facility-based interventions. Three were focused on community interventions, two had community and facility components, and one was a workplace program. Overall quality of the evidence was moderate, including evidence for counseling interventions. Male partner involvement, integration with other service delivery platforms, such as prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and immunization, and innovative product delivery programs may increase knowledge and use during the postpartum period. Community-based and workplace strategies need a much stronger base of evidence to prompt recommendations.

Keywords: birth spacing; contraception; family planning; interventions; less developed countries; postpartum period; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of study search and selection process.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Singh S, Darroch JE. Adding It Up: Costs and Benefits of Contraceptive Services. New York: Guttmacher Institute and United Nations Population Fund; 2014.
    1. Singh S, Darroch JE. Adding It Up: Costs and Benefits of Contraceptive Services Estimates for 2012. New York: UNFPA, Guttmacher Institute; 2012.
    1. Sedgh G, Singh S, Hussain R. Intended and unintended pregnancies worldwide in 2012 and recent trends. Stud Fam Plann. 2014;45(3):301–314. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andreev K, Kantorova V, Bongaarts J, United Nations Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs 2015. [Accessed June 4, 2015]. Available from: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/technical/....
    1. Borda MR, Winfrey W, McKaig C. Return to sexual activity and modern family planning use in the extended postpartum period: an analysis of findings from seventeen countries. Afr J Reprod Health. 2010;14(4 Spec):72–79. - PubMed