Barriers to accessing and using contraception in highland Guatemala: the development of a family planning self-efficacy scale
- PMID: 29386939
- PMCID: PMC5683161
- DOI: 10.2147/OAJC.S95674
Barriers to accessing and using contraception in highland Guatemala: the development of a family planning self-efficacy scale
Abstract
Understanding the persistent inequalities in the prevalence rates of family planning and unmet need for family planning between indigenous and nonindigenous women in Guatemala requires localized explorations of the specific barriers faced by indigenous women. Based on social cognitive theory, elicitation interviews were carried out with a purposive sample of 16 young women, aged 20-24 years, married or in union, from the rural districts of Patzún, Chimaltenango, Guatemala. Content analysis was carried out using the constant-comparison method to identify the major themes. Based on this qualitative study, the following barriers are incorporated into the development of a self-efficacy scale: lack of knowledge about and availability of methods, fear of side effects and infertility, husbands being against family planning (and related fears of marital problems and abandonment), pressure from in-laws and the community, and the belief that using contraception is a sin. This is the first evidence-informed self-efficacy scale developed with young adult, indigenous women that addresses the issue of family planning in Latin America.
Keywords: elicitation interviews; indigenous; marginalized populations; social cognitive theory.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Similar articles
-
A Qualitative Assessment of Community Attitudes and Barriers to Family Planning Use in the Trifinio Region of Southwest Guatemala.Matern Child Health J. 2018 Apr;22(4):461-466. doi: 10.1007/s10995-018-2479-0. Matern Child Health J. 2018. PMID: 29423587
-
"When you least expect, this happens, it's already growing": Problematizing the definition of unmet need for family planning.Open Access J Contracept. 2019 May 29;10:7-18. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S184909. eCollection 2019. Open Access J Contracept. 2019. PMID: 31213931 Free PMC article.
-
Contraceptive use and fertility in Guatemala.Stud Fam Plann. 1985 Sep-Oct;16(5):279-88. Stud Fam Plann. 1985. PMID: 4060213
-
Women's choice between indigenous and Western contraception in urban Mozambique.Women Health. 1998;28(2):1-17. doi: 10.1300/j013v28n02_01. Women Health. 1998. PMID: 10067803 Review.
-
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26606712 English, French.
Cited by
-
Measuring women's agency in family planning: the conceptual and structural factors in the way.Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2022 Dec;30(1):2062161. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2062161. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2022. PMID: 35648047 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Assessing the application of adapted theory of planned behaviour in predicting postpartum family planning intentions in a pragmatic randomized control trial in Western Kenya.PLoS One. 2025 Feb 5;20(2):e0315029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315029. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 39908241 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Design and pilot testing of a church-based intervention to address interpersonal and intrapersonal barriers to uptake of family planning in rural Tanzania: a qualitative implementation study.BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Jul;46(3):226-233. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2019-200505. Epub 2020 Jan 14. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2020. PMID: 31937520 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of a family planning self-efficacy measure with married women in Bihar, India: Findings from the Bihar Integrated Family Planning Survey.Contracept X. 2024 Nov 13;6:100113. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2024.100113. eCollection 2024. Contracept X. 2024. PMID: 39687762 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of the Fertility Norms Scale and Association with Fertility Intention and Contraceptive Use in India.Stud Fam Plann. 2023 Mar;54(1):39-61. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12227. Epub 2023 Jan 23. Stud Fam Plann. 2023. PMID: 36691257 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Haub C, Gribble J. The world at 7 billion. Popul Bull. 2011;66(2):1.
-
- Mills S, Bos E, Suzuki E. Unmet Need for Contraception. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2010.
-
- Westoff C. New Estimates of Unmet Need and the Demand for Family Planning: DHS Comparative Reports Number 14. Calverton, MD: 2006.
-
- Figueroa W, Lopez F, Remez L, Prada E, Drescher J. Early childbearing in Guatemala: a continuing challenge. Issues Brief (Alan Guttmacher Inst) 2006;5(1):1–30. - PubMed
-
- Kols A. Reducing unmet need for family planning: evidence-based strategies and approaches. Outlook. 2008;25(1):1.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources