Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec 20:11:1179558117749603.
doi: 10.1177/1179558117749603. eCollection 2017.

Protection for Children Born Through Assisted Reproductive Technologies Act, B.E. 2558: The Changing Profile of Surrogacy in Thailand

Affiliations

Protection for Children Born Through Assisted Reproductive Technologies Act, B.E. 2558: The Changing Profile of Surrogacy in Thailand

Alessandro Stasi. Clin Med Insights Reprod Health. .

Abstract

The National Legislative Assembly of Thailand has enacted on February 19, 2015 the Protection for Children Born through Assisted Reproductive Technologies Act (ART Act). Its primary objective aims at protecting children born through assisted reproductive technologies and providing the legal procedures that the intended parents must follow. The focus of this article is to discuss the ongoing issues involving assisted reproduction in Thailand. After reviewing the past legal framework surrounding surrogate motherhood and the downsides of the assisted reproductive technology market in Thailand, the article will discuss the new ART Act and its regulatory framework. It will conclude that although the new law contains some flaws and limitations, it has so far been successful in tackling surrogacy trafficking and preventing reproductive scandals from occurring again.

Keywords: Thailand; public policy; reproductive techniques; surrogacy contracts; surrogate mothers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests:The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kelly L. In vitro fertilisation: the science and the ethics in the 21st century. Human Reprod Genet Ethics. 2001;7:15–20. - PubMed
    1. Dana AR. The state of surrogacy laws: determining legal parentage for gay fathers. Duke J Gender L & Pol. 2010;18:353.
    1. Macklin R. Artificial means of reproduction and our understanding of the family. Hastings Center Rep. 1991;21:5–11. - PubMed
    1. Kermani EJ, Weiss BA. Biological parents regaining their rights: a psycholegal analysis of a new era in custody disputes. J Am Acad Psychiat Law Online. 1995;23:261–267. - PubMed
    1. Hofman DL. Mama’s baby, daddy’s maybe: a state-by-state survey of surrogacy laws and their disparate gender impact. Wm Mitchell L Rev. 2008;35:449–468.

LinkOut - more resources