Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct;24(5):73-82.
doi: 10.21315/mjms2017.24.5.8. Epub 2017 Oct 26.

Target-controlled Infusion Propofol Versus Sevoflurane Anaesthesia for Emergency Traumatic Brain Surgery: Comparison of the Outcomes

Affiliations

Target-controlled Infusion Propofol Versus Sevoflurane Anaesthesia for Emergency Traumatic Brain Surgery: Comparison of the Outcomes

Wan Mohd Nazaruddin Wan Hassan et al. Malays J Med Sci. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

Background: The choice of anaesthetic techniques is important for the outcome of traumatic brain injury (TBI) emergency surgery. The objective of this study was to compare patient outcomes for target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol and sevoflurane anaesthesia.

Methods: A total of 110 severe TBI patients, aged 18-60, who underwent emergency brain surgery were randomised into Group T (TCI) (n = 55) and Group S (sevoflurane) (n = 55). Anaesthesia was maintained in Group T with propofol target plasma concentration of 3-6 μg/mL and in Group S with minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane 1.0-1.5. Both groups received TCI remifentanil 2-8 ng/mL for analgesia. After the surgery, patients were managed in the intensive care unit and were followed up until discharge for the outcome parameters.

Results: Demographic characteristics were comparable in both groups. Differences in Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score at discharge were not significant between Group T and Group S (P = 0.25): the percentages of mortality (GOS 1) [27.3% versus 16.4%], vegetative and severe disability (GOS 2-3) [29.1% versus 41.8%] and good outcome (GOS 4-5) [43.6% versus 41.8%] were comparable in both groups. There were no significant differences in other outcome parameters.

Conclusion: TCI propofol and sevoflurane anaesthesia were comparable in the outcomes of TBI patients after emergency surgery.

Keywords: Glasgow Outcome Scale; infusion; propofol; traumatic brain injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kerr ZY, Harmon KJ, Marshall SW, Proescholdbell SK, Waller AE. The epidemiology of traumatic brain injuries treated in emergency departments in North Carolina, 2010–2011. N C Med J. 2014;75(1):8–14. - PubMed
    1. Sabariah FJ, Ramesh N, Mahathar AW. National Trauma Database (NTrD)–improving trauma care: first year report. Med J Malaysia. 2008;63(Suppl C):45–49. - PubMed
    1. Tay EL, Lee SW, Jamaluddin SF, Tam CL, Wong CP. The epidemiology of childhood brain injury in the state of Selangor and Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. BMC Pediatr. 2016;16:56. https://doi.org/10.1186/sl2887-016-0590-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ravussin P, Strebel S. Propofol for neuroanesthesia. Anaesthesist. 1995;44(6):405–409. - PubMed
    1. Bedforth NM, Hardman JG, Nathanson MH. Cerebral hemodynamic response to the introduction of desflurane: a comparison with sevoflurane. Anesth Analg. 2000;91(1):152–155. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources