Development of a Preventive HIV Vaccine Requires Solving Inverse Problems Which Is Unattainable by Rational Vaccine Design
- PMID: 29387066
- PMCID: PMC5776009
- DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.02009
Development of a Preventive HIV Vaccine Requires Solving Inverse Problems Which Is Unattainable by Rational Vaccine Design
Abstract
Hypotheses and theories are essential constituents of the scientific method. Many vaccinologists are unaware that the problems they try to solve are mostly inverse problems that consist in imagining what could bring about a desired outcome. An inverse problem starts with the result and tries to guess what are the multiple causes that could have produced it. Compared to the usual direct scientific problems that start with the causes and derive or calculate the results using deductive reasoning and known mechanisms, solving an inverse problem uses a less reliable inductive approach and requires the development of a theoretical model that may have different solutions or none at all. Unsuccessful attempts to solve inverse problems in HIV vaccinology by reductionist methods, systems biology and structure-based reverse vaccinology are described. The popular strategy known as rational vaccine design is unable to solve the multiple inverse problems faced by HIV vaccine developers. The term "rational" is derived from "rational drug design" which uses the 3D structure of a biological target for designing molecules that will selectively bind to it and inhibit its biological activity. In vaccine design, however, the word "rational" simply means that the investigator is concentrating on parts of the system for which molecular information is available. The economist and Nobel laureate Herbert Simon introduced the concept of "bounded rationality" to explain why the complexity of the world economic system makes it impossible, for instance, to predict an event like the financial crash of 2007-2008. Humans always operate under unavoidable constraints such as insufficient information, a limited capacity to process huge amounts of data and a limited amount of time available to reach a decision. Such limitations always prevent us from achieving the complete understanding and optimization of a complex system that would be needed to achieve a truly rational design process. This is why the complexity of the human immune system prevents us from rationally designing an HIV vaccine by solving inverse problems.
Keywords: antibody affinity maturation; bounded rationality; inverse problems; rational vaccine design; reductionism; reverse vaccinology; transmitted founder virus; virus inactivation.
References
-
- Chalmers AF. What Is This Thing Called Science. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press, Mc Graw-Hill House; (1999). p. 1–226.
-
- Bauer HH. Scientific Literacy and the Myth of the Scientific Method. Urbana, Chicago, US: University of Illinois Press; (1992). p. 1–180.
-
- Stokes DE. Pasteur’s Quadrant. Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington, DC, USA: Brooking Institution Press; (1997). p. 1–196.
-
- Gauch HG. Scientific Method in Brief. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ Press; (2012). p. 1–288.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
