Does Frequency of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Presentation Impact Quality of Care?
- PMID: 29387508
- PMCID: PMC5786343
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.1879
Does Frequency of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Presentation Impact Quality of Care?
Abstract
Objectives The volume of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarctions (STEMIs) presenting to an emergency department (ED) has been shown to affect treatment quality measures and patient outcomes. Almost half of ST-elevation-myocardial-infarction (STEMI) patients in New Brunswick (NB) present directly to community hospitals. This study seeks to determine if the quality of care received by STEMI patients presenting to EDs in NB is related to the volume of STEMI presentations at that center. Methods This retrospective registry-based study used data from the STEMI database at the New Brunswick Heart Centre (NBHC), identifying 1196 cases of STEMI in NB, Canada, between December 2010 and April 2013. Patients were stratified into three groups based on the annual volume of STEMIs seen at the presenting center. Quality of care determinants, consisting of the percent of cases adhering to door-to-ECG (D2E), ECG-to-needle (E2N), and door-to-needle (D2N) time guidelines were then compared between groups. Results The mean age of the 1188 cases identified was 61.3 years, 73.8% were male, and 69.0% received thrombolysis. There was no difference in the rate of guideline adherence between the high, medium, and low-volume centers. The total rates of guideline adherence were 43.7%, 44.9%, and 47.5% for the D2E, E2N, and D2N times, respectively. Conclusion We did not identify any relationship between the rates of adherence with STEMI care guidelines and the volume of STEMI patients presenting to a center. Adherence rates were lower than in previously reported series from other regions. Further efforts should be undertaken to identify the causes of delayed STEMI diagnosis and treatment in our population and to implement system changes to improve standards of care.
Keywords: electrocardiogram; emergency care; myocardial infarction; quality.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Performance of Emergency Department Screening Criteria for an Early ECG to Identify ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Feb 23;6(3):e003528. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003528. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017. PMID: 28232323 Free PMC article.
-
Fallacy of Median Door-to-ECG Time: Hidden Opportunities for STEMI Screening Improvement.J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 May 3;11(9):e024067. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024067. Epub 2022 May 2. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022. PMID: 35492001 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of time of presentation on process performance and outcomes in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a report from the American Heart Association: Mission Lifeline program.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Sep;7(5):656-63. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000740. Epub 2014 Jul 29. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014. PMID: 25074371
-
A method for improving arrival-to-electrocardiogram time in emergency department chest pain patients and the effect on door-to-balloon time for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Oct;16(10):921-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00493.x. Epub 2009 Sep 15. Acad Emerg Med. 2009. PMID: 19754862
-
Contemporary NSTEMI management: the role of the hospitalist.Hosp Pract (1995). 2020 Feb;48(1):1-11. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2020.1701329. Epub 2020 Feb 20. Hosp Pract (1995). 2020. PMID: 31815570 Review.
References
-
- Trends in reperfusion strategies, door-to-needle and door-to-balloon times, and in-hospital mortality among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction enrolled in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction from 1990 to 2006. Gibson CM, Pride YB, Frederick PD, et al. Am Heart J. 2008;156:1034–1044. - PubMed
-
- Association between adoption of evidence-based treatment and survival for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Jernberg T, Johansen P, Held C, Svennblad B, Lindback J, Wallentin L. JAMA. 2011;305:1677–1684. - PubMed
-
- Comparison of thrombolysis followed by broad use of percutaneous coronary intervention with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation acute myocardial infarction: data from the French registry on acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (FAST-MI) Danchin N, Coste P, Ferrières J, et al. Circulation. 2008;118:268–276. - PubMed
-
- 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. Circulation. 2013;127:362–425. - PubMed
-
- ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), Steg PG, James SK, et al. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2569–2619. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous