Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan;30(96):19-25.

Evaluation of Culturally-Familiar Odorants for a Persian Smell Identification Test

Seyed Kamran Kamrava  1 , Maryam Jalessi  1 , Shaghayegh Ebrahimnejad  1 , Sahand Ghalehbaghi  1 , Elahe Amini  2 , Alimohamad Asghari  1 , Farhad Rafiei  1 , Mohammad Farhadi  1
Affiliations

Evaluation of Culturally-Familiar Odorants for a Persian Smell Identification Test

Seyed Kamran Kamrava et al. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction: Processing odor information by the olfactory system depends greatly on the odor concentration. In order to use an odorant in a smell identification test (SIT), the minimum identification concentration (MIC) needs to be determined.

Materials and methods: This study was conducted in 60 healthy native individuals aged 20 to 60 years, selected from patients' companions in a tertiary hospital. In the first step, 25 odorants were presented to evaluate familiarity among the subjects. Then, the MICs for the eligible odorants were measured using the ascending method of limits.

Results: Out of 25 odorants, only one (cacao) was distinguished by less than 70% of the subjects, and was therefore removed from the list. The MICs of the remaining 24 odorants ranged from 6.87±2.74% for menthol to 27.62±18.98% for cantaloupe. There was significant correlation between age and the MIC only for coffee (P=0.02, r=-0.300). There was a significant difference in MIC between men and women only for hazelnut (P=0.03).

Conclusion: We present the MICs of 24 culturally-familiar odorants in a sample of the Persian population in a SIT.

Keywords: Culture; Identification; Odorants; Smell.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hummel T, Landis B N, Hüttenbrink K-B. Smell and taste disorders. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;10 Doc04. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gros A, Manera V, De March CA, Guevara N, König A, Friedman L, et al. Olfactory disturbances in ageing with and without dementia: towards new diagnostic tools. J Laryngol Otol. 2017;131:572–9. - PubMed
    1. Barresi M, Ciurleo R, Giacoppo S, Foti Cuzzola V, Celi D, Bramanti P, et al. Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases. J Neurol Sci. 2012;323:16–24. - PubMed
    1. Eibenstein A, Fioretti AB, Lena C, Rosati N, Amabile G, Fusetti M. Modern psychophysical tests to assess olfactory function. Neurol Sci. 2005;26(3):147–55. - PubMed
    1. Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf SR, Pauli E, Kobal G. ‘Sniffin’ sticks’: olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses. 1997;22:39–52. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources