Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 17:5:296.
doi: 10.3389/fped.2017.00296. eCollection 2017.

Effects of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and High-Flow Nasal Cannula on Sucking, Swallowing, and Breathing during Bottle-Feeding in Lambs

Affiliations

Effects of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and High-Flow Nasal Cannula on Sucking, Swallowing, and Breathing during Bottle-Feeding in Lambs

Nathalie Samson et al. Front Pediatr. .

Abstract

The use of prolonged respiratory support under the form of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) or nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) is frequent in newborn infants. Introduction of oral feeding under such nasal respiratory support is, however, highly controversial among neonatologists, due to the fear that it could disrupt sucking, swallowing, and breathing coordination and in turn induce cardiorespiratory events. The recent observation of tracheal aspirations during bottle-feeding in preterm infants under nCPAP justifies the use of animal models to perform more comprehensive physiological studies on the subject, in order to gain further insights for clinical studies. The objective of this study was to assess and compare the impact of HFNC and nCPAP on bottle-feeding in newborn lambs, in terms of bottle-feeding efficiency and safety as well as sucking-swallowing-breathing coordination. Eight full-term lambs were instrumented to record sucking, swallowing, and respiration as well as electrocardiogram and oxygenation. Lambs were bottle-fed in a standardized manner during three randomly ordered conditions, namely nCPAP 6 cmH2O, HFNC 7 L/min, and no respiratory support. Results revealed that nCPAP decreased feeding duration [25 vs. 31 s (control) vs. 57 s (HFNC), p = 0.03] and increased the rate of milk transfer [2.4 vs. 1.9 mL/s (control) vs.1.1 mL/s (HFNC), p = 0.03]. No other indices of bottle-feeding safety or sucking-swallowing-breathing coordination were significantly altered by HFNC or nCPAP. In conclusion, our results obtained in full-term newborn lambs suggest that: (i) nCPAP 6 cmH2O, but not HFNC 7 L/min, increases bottle-feeding efficiency; (ii) bottle-feeding is safe under nCPAP 6 cmH2O and HFNC 7 L/min, with no significant alteration in sucking-swallowing-breathing coordination. The present informative and reassuring data in full-term healthy lambs must be complemented by similar studies in preterm lambs, including mild-to-moderate respiratory distress alleviated by respiratory support in order to mimic preterm infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia and pave the way for clinical studies.

Keywords: bottle-feeding efficiency and safety; full-term lambs; high-flow nasal cannula; nasal continuous positive airway pressure; sucking–swallowing–breathing coordination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sample tracings of bottle-feeding during no respiratory support (control condition) (A), nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) 6 cmH2O (B) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) 7 L/min (C) in one full-term lamb, showing decreased feeding duration with nCPAP 6 cmH2O only. Respiratory inhibition (apnea) was unusually pronounced during nCPAP and HFNC in this particular lamb compared to all the other lambs. The two dashed lines indicate the bottle-feeding period. Abbreviations from top to bottom: sucking (positive expression pressure on the bottle teat); EAta, electrical activity of the thyroarytenoid muscle for recording swallowing activity; (∫EAta, moving time averaged EAta; respiratory movements, sum signal of the respiratory inductance plethysmography; ECG, electrocardiogram; and ★, body movements. Of note, the oxygen hemoglobin saturation signal was not adequate in this lamb due to dark pigmentation of the tail.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. DeMauro SB, Millar D, Kirpalani H. Noninvasive respiratory support for neonates. Curr Opin Pediatr (2014) 26(2):157–62.10.1097/MOP.0000000000000066 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Di Fiore JM, Poets CF, Gauda E, Martin RJ, MacFarlane P. Cardiorespiratory events in preterm infants: interventions and consequences. J Perinatol (2016) 36(4):251–8.10.1038/jp.2015.165 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilkinson D, Andersen C, O’Donnell CP, De Paoli AG, Manley BJ. High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2016) 2:CD006405.10.1002/14651858.CD006405.pub3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Hospital discharge of the high-risk neonate. Pediatrics (2008) 122(5):1119–26.10.1542/peds.2008-2174 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Simpson C, Schanler RJ, Lau C. Early introduction of oral feeding in preterm infants. Pediatrics (2002) 110(3):517–22.10.1542/peds.110.3.517 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources