Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2017 Dec;96(51):e9151.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009151.

The comparison of acute toxicity in 2 treatment courses: Three-weekly and weekly cisplatin treatment administered with radiotherapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Affiliations
Observational Study

The comparison of acute toxicity in 2 treatment courses: Three-weekly and weekly cisplatin treatment administered with radiotherapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Jacek Mackiewicz et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec.

Abstract

The most appropriate cisplatin treatment schedule delivered with radiotherapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the acute toxicity and its impact on the course of the treatment, administered cisplatin and radiation doses, the length of hospitalization and supportive drugs administration in patients with HNSCC receiving 2 different cisplatin treatment schedules administered with radiotherapy.In this retrospective analysis, 104 patients with HNSCC were enrolled. Patients received radiation concurrently with 100 mg/m cisplatin administered 3-weekly (n = 50; group A) or 35 to 40 mg/m cisplatin administered weekly (n = 54; group B). Chemoradiotherapy was performed in locally and/or regionally advanced disease (stage III-IV), in a definitive radical upfront setting (71.1%) or after surgical resection in patients with high-risk factors (28.8%).Both study groups were equally distributed in terms of age, gender, stage of the disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score, chronic diseases and primary tumor site. The schedule of cisplatin dosing did not influence the duration of hospitalization, the number of additional supportive drugs (antibiotics, opioids) administered or total doses of received radiotherapy. However, postponement of radiotherapy due to adverse events was significantly more frequent in patients treated with 35/40 mg/m (55.56% vs 32%; P = .015). Furthermore, patients treated with weekly treatment schedule received lower total cisplatin dose (160 mg/m) in comparison to those treated with the 3-weekly schedule (200 mg/m). Grade 3 and 4 mucositis occurred more frequently in patients treated in group A (70% vs 50%; P = .037). Leukopenia was also observed more frequently in group A (88% vs 72.2%; P = .04), however there was no difference in grade 3/4 leukopenia between both study arms. There was no statistically significant difference in any other adverse effects.These results do not demonstrate the advantage of modified weekly schedule over standard 3-weekly cisplatin treatment plan. However, severe mucositis occurred more frequently in patients receiving 3-weekly cisplatin, both chemotherapy schedules seemed to present similar toxicity. Due to conflicting efficacy and toxicity, the results and compliance of weekly and 3-weekly cisplatin schedules should be evaluated in further randomized, controlled trials and retrospective studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Hematological toxicity leukopenia.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Hematological toxicity neutrophilopenia.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Hematological toxicity anemia.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Hematological toxicity thrombocytopenia.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Hematological toxicity febrile neutropenia.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Mucositis.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Skin toxicity.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Kidney injury. Acute kidney injury in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy cisplatin 100 mg/m2 group, 35/40 mg/m2 group and both cisplatin groups.

References

    1. Krzakowski M, Potemski P, Warzocha K, et al. Onkologia Kliniczna. Nowotwory narządów głowy i szyi. VM Media sp z o o, Gdańsk 2013;1–32.
    1. Pignon JP, Bourhis J, Domenge C, et al. Chemotherapy added to locoregional treatment for head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma: three meta-analyses of updated individual data. MACH-NC Collaborative Group. Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy on Head and Neck Cancer. Lancet 2000;355:949–55. - PubMed
    1. Pignon JP, le Maıtre A, Maillard E, et al. MACH-NC Collaborative Group. Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACHNC): an update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients. Radiother Oncol 2009;92:4–14. - PubMed
    1. Gregoire V, Lefebvre JL, Licitra L, et al. EHNS-ESMO-ESTRO Guidelines Working Group. Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: EHNS-ESMO-ESTRO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2010;21(suppl 5):v184–6. - PubMed
    1. Cooper JS, Pajak TF, Forastiere AA, et al. Postoperative concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1937–44. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources