Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan;143(1):306.
doi: 10.1121/1.5020787.

Distribution of spectral modulation transfer functions in a young, normal-hearing population

Affiliations

Distribution of spectral modulation transfer functions in a young, normal-hearing population

Eric C Hoover et al. J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

Spectral modulation transfer functions (SMTFs) were measured in 49 young (18-35 years of age) normal-hearing listeners. Noise carriers spanned six octaves from 200 to 12 800 Hz. Sinusoidal (on a log-amplitude scale) spectral modulation with random starting phase was superimposed on the carrier at spectral modulation frequencies of 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, and 8.0 cycles/octave. Modulation detection thresholds (in dB) yielded SMTFs that were bandpass in nature, consistent with previous investigations reporting data for only a few subjects. Thresholds were notably consistent across subjects despite minimal practice. Population statistics are reported that may serve as reference data for future studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
(Color online) Spectral modulation detection thresholds in dB relative to a flat spectrum used in the standard stimulus as a function of spectral modulation frequency (cycles per octave). (Top) Thin lines depict individual data for 50 listeners with normal hearing. A single older listener (age: 56 yr) is depicted in red. The solid black line shows mean and standard deviation. (Bottom) Median and centile ranges are shown for the normative data. The dark shaded region shows the interquartile range and the light shaded region shows 5%–95%, indicating the limits of normal performance.

References

    1. Bernstein, J. G. , Mehraei, G. , Shamma, S. , Gallun, F. J. , Theodoroff, S. M. , and Leek, M. R. (2013). “ Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity as a predictor of speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 24, 293–306.10.3766/jaaa.24.4.5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chi, T. , Gao, Y. , Guyton, M. C. , Ru, P. , and Shamma, S. (1999). “ Spectro-temporal modulation transfer functions and speech intelligibility,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 2719–2732.10.1121/1.428100 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dau, T. , Kollmeier, B. , and Kohlrausch, A. (1997). “ Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation. I. Detection and masking with narrow-band carriers,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 2892–2905.10.1121/1.420344 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Davies-Venn, E. , Nelson, P. , and Souza, P. (2015). “ Comparing auditory filter bandwidths, spectral ripple modulation detection, spectral ripple discrimination, and speech recognition: Normal and impaired hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 138, 492–503.10.1121/1.4922700 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Drennan, W. D. , and Watson, C. S. (2001). “ Sources of variation in profile analysis. I. Individual differences and extended training,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 2491–2497.10.1121/1.1408310 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types