Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb 2;19(1):1.
doi: 10.1186/s12858-018-0091-y.

Feruloyl esterase immobilization in mesoporous silica particles and characterization in hydrolysis and transesterification

Affiliations

Feruloyl esterase immobilization in mesoporous silica particles and characterization in hydrolysis and transesterification

Cyrielle Bonzom et al. BMC Biochem. .

Abstract

Background: Enzymes display high reactivity and selectivity under natural conditions, but may suffer from decreased efficiency in industrial applications. A strategy to address this limitation is to immobilize the enzyme. Mesoporous silica materials offer unique properties as an immobilization support, such as high surface area and tunable pore size.

Results: The performance of a commercially available feruloyl esterase, E-FAERU, immobilized on mesoporous silica by physical adsorption was evaluated for its transesterification ability. We optimized the immobilization conditions by varying the support pore size, the immobilization buffer and its pH. Maximum loading and maximum activity were achieved at different pHs (4.0 and 6.0 respectively). Selectivity, shown by the transesterification/hydrolysis products molar ratio, varied more than 3-fold depending on the reaction buffer used and its pH. Under all conditions studied, hydrolysis was the dominant activity of the enzyme. pH and water content had the greatest influence on the enzyme selectivity and activity. Determined kinetic parameters of the enzyme were obtained and showed that Km was not affected by the immobilization but kcat was reduced 10-fold when comparing the free and immobilized enzymes. Thermal and pH stabilities as well as the reusability were investigated. The immobilized biocatalyst retained more than 20% of its activity after ten cycles of transesterification reaction.

Conclusions: These results indicate that this enzyme is more suited for hydrolysis reactions than transesterification despite good reusability. Furthermore, it was found that the immobilization conditions are crucial for optimal enzyme activity as they can alter the enzyme performance.

Keywords: E-FAERU; Enzyme reusability; Enzyme stability; Feruloyl esterase selectivity; Kinetic parameters; Mesoporous silica.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors’ information

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Reaction scheme of feruloyl esterase catalysis in a buffer-butanol mixture where both transesterification reaction converting methyl ferulate (MFA) to butyl ferulate (BFA) and hydrolysis reaction converting MFA to ferulic acid (FA) take place
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Effect of immobilization pH and of enzyme concentration on loading and enzymatic activity. a Effect of immobilization pH on the loading using different buffers. b Effect of enzyme concentration on the loading. c Influence of the immobilization pH and buffer on the BFA/FA molar ratio. The results are compared to those obtained for the free enzyme at pH 7.0 in the respective buffers. d Influence of the immobilization pH on the BFA specific activity. The results are compared to those obtained for the free enzyme at pH 7.0 in the respective buffers. All reactions were in initial velocity. All values are averages of triplicates and the error bars represent one standard deviation
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Effect of the reaction pH for free and immobilized enzyme. a Effect on the BFA/FA molar ratio. b Effect on the BFA specific activity. (Reactions were performed in a 1-butanol (92.5%) phosphate-citrate buffer (7.5%) mixture. The pH of the buffer fraction was varied from 6.0 to 8.0. Immobilization was performed at pH 6.5 and only the reaction pH was varied.) All reactions were in initial velocity. The results are the average of triplicate samples, and the error bars represent one standard deviation
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Influence of the water content on the selectivity of free and immobilized enzyme. a Effect on the BFA/FA ratio. b Effect on the BFA activity. All reactions were in initial velocity. The results are averages of triplicate samples, and the error bars represent one standard deviation
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Determination of pH and temperature optima for the four reaction systems studied a Optimum pH. Reaction rates measured using phosphate-citrate buffer at pH 5.0–8.0 and 40 °C. b Optimum temperature. The temperature was varied from 15 to 80 °C and the reaction was performed using phosphate-citrate buffer at pH 7.0. All reactions were in initial velocity. The results are the average of triplicate samples, and the error bars represent one standard deviation
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Evaluation of the reusability of the immobilized enzyme over 10 cycles of 48 h each. a Relative residual hydrolytic and transesterification activities. b Evolution of the BFA/FA ratio during the experiment. All reactions were in initial velocity. Data are averages of triplicates. Error bars represent one standard deviation

References

    1. Hudson S, Cooney J, Magner E. Proteins in mesoporous silicates. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:8582–8594. doi: 10.1002/anie.200705238. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rodrigues RC, Ortiz C, Berenguer-Murcia Á, Torres R, Fernández-Lafuente R. Modifying enzyme activity and selectivity by immobilization. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:6290–6307. doi: 10.1039/C2CS35231A. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Datta S, Christena LR, YRS R. Enzyme immobilization: an overview on techniques and support materials. 3 Biotech. 2013;3:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s13205-012-0071-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carlsson N, Gustafsson H, Thörn C, Olsson L, Holmberg K, Åkerman B. Enzymes immobilized in mesoporous silica: a physical-chemical perspective. Adv Colloid Interf Sci. 2014;205:339–360. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2013.08.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Magner E. Immobilisation of enzymes on mesoporous silicate materials. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:6213–6222. doi: 10.1039/c2cs35450k. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources