Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb 1;8(2):e019615.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019615.

Socioeconomic differences in hearing among middle-aged and older adults: cross-sectional analyses using the Health Survey for England

Affiliations

Socioeconomic differences in hearing among middle-aged and older adults: cross-sectional analyses using the Health Survey for England

Shaun Scholes et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Background: Hearing loss impacts on cognitive, social and physical functioning. Both hearing loss and hearing aid use vary across population subgroups. We examined whether hearing loss, and reported current hearing aid use among persons with hearing loss, were associated with different markers of socioeconomic status (SES) in a nationally representative sample of community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults.

Methods: Hearing was measured using an audiometric screening device in the Health Survey for England 2014 (3292 participants aged 45 years and over). Hearing loss was defined as >35 dB HL at 3.0 kHz in the better-hearing ear. Using sex-specific logistic regression modelling, we evaluated the associations between SES and hearing after adjustment for potential confounders.

Results: 26% of men and 20% of women aged 45 years and over had hearing loss. Hearing loss was higher among men in the lowest SES groups. For example, the multivariable-adjusted odds of hearing loss were almost two times as high for those in the lowest versus the highest income tertile (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.74). Among those with hearing loss, 30% of men and 27% of women were currently using a hearing aid. Compared with men in the highest income tertile, the multivariable-adjusted odds of using a hearing aid nowadays were lower for men in the middle (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.99) and the lowest (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.97) income tertiles. Associations between SES and hearing were weaker or null among women.

Conclusions: While the burden of hearing loss fell highest among men in the lowest SES groups, current hearing aid use was demonstrably lower. Initiatives to detect hearing loss early and increase the uptake and the use of hearing aids may provide substantial public health benefits and reduce socioeconomic inequalities in health.

Keywords: epidemiology; hearing aids; hearing loss; social inequalities; surveys.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selection of study participants, Health Survey for England (HSE) 2014.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Association between socioeconomic status (SES) and hearing loss in middle-aged and older adults. Indicators of SES were equivalised household income tertiles (highest tertile as reference), Index of Multiple Deprivation quintiles (least deprived) and highest educational attainment (degree or higher). Lines represent OR (outcome=hearing loss) and its 95% CI. Model A (triangles): adjusted for age. Model B (circles): adjusted for age, exposure to work-related noise, region and cardiovascular disease risk factors (smoking, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia and physical inactivity).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Association between socioeconomic status (SES) and current hearing aid use in middle-aged and older adults with hearing loss. Indicators of SES were equivalised household income tertiles (highest tertile as reference), Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) quintiles (least deprived Q1 and Q2) and highest educational attainment (O level and above). Lines represent OR (outcome=hearing aid use) and its 95% CI. Model A (triangles): adjusted for age. Model B (circles): adjusted for: age, severity of hearing loss, exposure to work-related noise, region and cardiovascular disease risk factors (smoking, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia and physical inactivity).

References

    1. Lin FR, Yaffe K, Xia J, et al. . Hearing loss and cognitive decline in older adults. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:293–9. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.1868 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lin FR, Metter EJ, O’Brien RJ, et al. . Hearing loss and incident dementia. Arch Neurol 2011;68:214–20. 10.1001/archneurol.2010.362 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Surprenant AM, DiDonato R. Community-dwelling older adults with hearing loss experience greater decline in cognitive function over time than those with normal hearing. Evid Based Nurs 2014;17:60–1. 10.1136/eb-2013-101375 - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Prevention of noise-induced hearing loss. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 1997.
    1. Olusanya BO, Neumann KJ, Saunders JE. The global burden of disabling hearing impairment: a call to action. Bull World Health Organ 2014;92:367–73. 10.2471/BLT.13.128728 - DOI - PMC - PubMed