Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Feb 1;8(1):2100.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20317-0.

Comparison of plants with C3 and C4 carbon fixation pathways for remediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon contaminated soils

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of plants with C3 and C4 carbon fixation pathways for remediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon contaminated soils

Anithadevi Kenday Sivaram et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The phytoremediation technique has been demonstrated to be a viable option for the remediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) contaminated sites. This study evaluated the potential applicability of plants with C3 and C4 carbon fixation pathways for the phytoremediation of recalcitrant high molecular weight (HMW) PAHs contaminated soil. A 60 and 120-day greenhouse study was conducted which showed higher degradation of HMW PAHs in soil grown with C4 plants when compared to C3 plants. Also, no PAHs were detected in the maize cobs, sunflower, wallaby, and Sudan grass seeds at the end of the experiment. The effect of plants in modifying the microbial community and dynamics in the rhizosphere was also examined by measuring soil biochemical properties such as dehydrogenase activity and water-soluble phenols. The results demonstrate a substantial difference in the microbial populations between planted and unplanted soils, which in turn facilitate the degradation of PAHs. To the best of our knowledge, this study for the first time evaluated the phytoremediation efficacy through the A. cepa cyto- and genotoxicity assay which should be considered as an integral part of all remediation experiments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The effect of C3 and C4 plant species on the percentage removal of PAHs from the contaminated soils: (a) Percentage PAHs removal at 60th day (b) Percentage PAHs removal at 120th day. Bars with same letters do not differ significantly at the 5% level of significance according to Duncan Multiple Range Test (DMRT).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Remediation efficacy testing with A. cepa meristem root cells exposed to unplanted contaminated and phytoremediated soils (60th and 120th day) - Mitotic index (%); (b) Remediation efficacy testing with A.cepa meristem root cells exposed to unplanted contaminated and phytoremediated soils (60th and 120th day) - total aberration (%) Bars with same letters do not differ significantly at the 5% level of significance according to Duncan Multiple Range Test (DMRT); (c) Chromosomal aberrant cells observed in A. cepa grown in contaminated soils (A) Prophase, (B) Metaphase, (C) Anaphase, (D) Telophase, (A1) Disturbed prophase, (A2) Bivacuolated cells, (A3) Multivacuolar cells, (A4) Micronuclei, (B1) Fragments, (B2) C-mitosis, and bridges, (B3) Disturbed metaphase, (B4) Sticky metaphase, (C1) Anaphase bridges, (C2) Laggards, (C3) Multipolar anaphase, (C4) Anaphase with vagrant laggards, (D1) Anaphase fragments.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Levels of genotoxicity seen in A. cepa meristem root cells exposed to unplanted contaminated and phytoremediated soils (60th day); (b) Levels of genotoxicity seen in A. cepa meristem root cells exposed to unplanted contaminated and phytoremediated soils (120th day). The means sharing same capital letters do not differ significantly at the 5% level of significance according to DMRT for TD (%) and OTM (%).

References

    1. ATDSR (ed. Public Health Service US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry) (USA, 2005).
    1. Kuppusamy S, et al. Remediation approaches for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) contaminated soils: Technological constraints, emerging trends and future directions. Chemosphere. 2017;168:944–968. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.10.115. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Macek T, Mackova M, Káš J. Exploitation of plants for the removal of organics in environmental remediation. Biotechnol. Adv. 2000;18:23–34. doi: 10.1016/S0734-9750(99)00034-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Edwards, R., Dixon, D. P., Cummins, I., Brazier-Hicks, M. & Skipsey, M. In Organic Xenobiotics and Plants 125–148 (Springer, 2011).
    1. Corgié S, Joner EJ, Leyval C. Rhizospheric degradation of phenanthrene is a function of proximity to roots. Plant Soil. 2003;257:143–150. doi: 10.1023/A:1026278424871. - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources