Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Mar;54(1):35-38.
doi: 10.5152/tao.2016.1129. Epub 2016 Apr 26.

The Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Head and Neck Cancers and Its Application Areas

Deniz Demir  1
Affiliations
Review

The Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Head and Neck Cancers and Its Application Areas

Deniz Demir. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

The management of the clinically N0 neck in patients with head and neck cancers still remains controversial. Elective neck dissection is traditionally recommended when the subside of the head and neck, such as the oral cavity and supraglottic area, confers at least a 15-20% risk of lymphatic spread. However, elective neck dissection may cause an increase in patient morbidity and mortality rates. The emergence of sentinel lymph biopsy provides the possibility of accurate pathological staging of the cervical node with a less invasive procedure. The present review will summarize the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy and its application areas when evaluating occult metastases in patients with head and neck cancers.

Keywords: Sentinel lymph node biopsy; diagnosis; head and neck cancer; lymphatic metastasis; lymphoscintigraphy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yamauchi K, Kogashiwa Y, Nakamura T, Moro Y, Nagafuji H, Kohno N. Diagnostic evaluation of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Head Neck. 2015;37:127–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.23526. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Layland MK, Sessions DG, Lenox J. The influence of lymph node metastasis in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx: N0 versus N+ Laryngoscope. 2005;115:629–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000161338.54515.b1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pillsbury HC, 3rd, Clark M. A rationale for therapy of the N0 neck. Laryngoscope. 1997;107:1294–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005537-199710000-00004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goudakos JK, Markou K, Nikolaou A, Themelis C, Vital V. Management of the clinically negative neck (N0) of supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma: a systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35:223–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2008.04.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rodrigo JP, Shah JP, Silver CE, Medina JE, Takes RP, Robbins KT. Management of the clinically negative neck in early-stage head and neck cancers after transoral resection. Head Neck. 2011;33:1210–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.21505. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources