Performance variability on perceptual discrimination tasks in profoundly deaf adults with cochlear implants
- PMID: 29395103
- PMCID: PMC5860985
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2018.01.005
Performance variability on perceptual discrimination tasks in profoundly deaf adults with cochlear implants
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate performance on two challenging listening tasks, talker and regional accent discrimination, and to assess variables that could have affected the outcomes.
Study design: A prospective study using 35 adults with one cochlear implant (CI) or a CI and a contralateral hearing aid (bimodal hearing) was conducted. Adults completed talker and regional accent discrimination tasks.
Methods: Two-alternative forced-choice tasks were used to assess talker and accent discrimination in a group of adults who ranged in age from 30 years old to 81 years old.
Results: A large amount of performance variability was observed across listeners for both discrimination tasks. Three listeners successfully discriminated between talkers for both listening tasks, 14 participants successfully completed one discrimination task and 18 participants were not able to discriminate between talkers for either listening task. Some adults who used bimodal hearing benefitted from the addition of acoustic cues provided through a HA but for others the HA did not help with discrimination abilities. Acoustic speech feature analysis of the test signals indicated that both the talker speaking rate and the fundamental frequency (F0) helped with talker discrimination. For accent discrimination, findings suggested that access to more salient spectral cues was important for better discrimination performance.
Conclusions: The ability to perform challenging discrimination tasks successfully likely involves a number of complex interactions between auditory and non-auditory pre- and post-implant factors. To understand why some adults with CIs perform similarly to adults with normal hearing and others experience difficulty discriminating between talkers, further research will be required with larger populations of adults who use unilateral CIs, bilateral CIs and bimodal hearing.
Keywords: Bimodal hearing; Cochlear implants; Speech discrimination.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
None of the authors has a conflict of interest associated with their involvement in this project.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Recognizing Voices Through a Cochlear Implant: A Systematic Review of Voice Perception, Talker Discrimination, and Talker Identification.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Aug 17;65(8):3165-3194. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00209. Epub 2022 Aug 4. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022. PMID: 35926089 Free PMC article.
-
Mandarin Tone and Vowel Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users: Effects of Talker Variability and Bimodal Hearing.Ear Hear. 2016 May-Jun;37(3):271-81. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000265. Ear Hear. 2016. PMID: 26752089 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users on speech recognition with competing talker, music perception, affective prosody discrimination, and talker identification.Ear Hear. 2011 Feb;32(1):16-30. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181edfbd2. Ear Hear. 2011. PMID: 21178567 Free PMC article.
-
Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.Hear Res. 2017 Jul;350:226-234. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 11. Hear Res. 2017. PMID: 28527538
-
Cochlear implants: indications and technology.Med Clin North Am. 1991 Nov;75(6):1267-76. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(16)30387-x. Med Clin North Am. 1991. PMID: 1943319 Review.
Cited by
-
Lexical effects on talker discrimination in adult cochlear implant usersa).J Acoust Soc Am. 2024 Mar 1;155(3):1631-1640. doi: 10.1121/10.0025011. J Acoust Soc Am. 2024. PMID: 38426835 Free PMC article.
-
The Acoustic Change Complex in Response to Frequency Changes and Its Correlation to Cochlear Implant Speech Outcomes.Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Oct 21;15:757254. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.757254. eCollection 2021. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 34744668 Free PMC article.
-
Factors affecting talker discrimination ability in adult cochlear implant users.J Commun Disord. 2022 Sep-Oct;99:106255. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106255. Epub 2022 Aug 13. J Commun Disord. 2022. PMID: 35988314 Free PMC article.
-
The Perception of Regional Dialects and Foreign Accents by Cochlear Implant Users.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Feb 17;64(2):683-690. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00496. Epub 2021 Jan 25. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021. PMID: 33493399 Free PMC article.
-
Recognizing Voices Through a Cochlear Implant: A Systematic Review of Voice Perception, Talker Discrimination, and Talker Identification.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Aug 17;65(8):3165-3194. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00209. Epub 2022 Aug 4. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022. PMID: 35926089 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Blamey P, Arndt P, Bergeron F, Bredberg G, Brimacombe J, Facer G, … Whitford L. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. Audiology and Neuro-Otology. 1996;1:293–306. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical