Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 May;74(5):571-582.
doi: 10.1007/s00228-018-2422-8. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic re-evaluation of a genetic-guided warfarin trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic re-evaluation of a genetic-guided warfarin trial

Carlo Federico Zambon et al. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 May.

Abstract

Purpose: A previous trial failed to demonstrate the superiority of a demographic-genetic algorithm in predicting warfarin (W) dose over a standard clinical approach. The purpose of the present study is to re-analyse the results in subgroups of patients with differing baseline sensitivity to W, integrated with additional pharmacokinetic data.

Methods: The original trial allocated 180 treatment-naïve patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation to a control arm (CTL, n = 92) or a genetic-guided arm (GEN, n = 88). Before starting anticoagulation treatment, all patients were genotyped for CYP2C9, VKORC1 and CYP4F2 variants and classified into four quartiles (Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4) according to the algorithm-predicted W maintenance dose. International normalised ratios (INR) and plasma concentrations of S-warfarin [S-W]s and R-warfarin [R-W]s were measured at baseline and on days 5, 7, 9, 12, 15 and 19 of therapy.

Results: In the lowest dose quartile (Q1), the number of INRs > 3 and mean INR values on days 5 and 7 were significantly higher in CTL than in GEN. In Q3 and Q4, the mean INR values reached therapeutic level (> 2) 2 days later in CTL than in GEN. During follow-up, the mean time courses of INRs and [S-W]s in GEN were remarkably stable in all dose quartiles. Thus, mean changes from starting to final doses were significantly smaller in GEN than in CTL. Plasma concentrations of R-W (a partially active enantiomer) steadily increased from day 5 to day 19 in all Qs in both CTL and GEN, except in the Q1 CTL group, due to the marked dose reduction required.

Conclusions: This analysis showed that the demographic-genetic algorithm used to predict the W dose can identify patients with differing degrees of sensitivity to W and to 'normalise' their average anticoagulant responses. The progressive rise in [R-W]s throughout the 19-day follow-up indicates that the (partial) contribution of R-W to the W anticoagulant effect changes continually during the early phase of treatment.

Keywords: Algorithm; Pharmacodynamic; Pharmacogenetics; Pharmacokinetics; Warfarin.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Thromb Haemost. 1993 Mar 1;69(3):236-9 - PubMed
    1. PLoS One. 2015 Dec 28;10 (12 ):e0145318 - PubMed
    1. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Apr;81(4):529-38 - PubMed
    1. Blood. 2009 Jan 22;113(4):784-92 - PubMed
    1. Chest. 2015 Sep;148(3):701-710 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources