Evaluation of cesarean scar after single- and double-layer hysterotomy closure: a prospective cross-sectional study
- PMID: 29397441
- DOI: 10.1007/s00404-018-4702-z
Evaluation of cesarean scar after single- and double-layer hysterotomy closure: a prospective cross-sectional study
Abstract
Background: We aimed to determine if there is a difference in the size of the cesarean scar defect using saline infusion sonography (SIS) performed on the postoperative third month in patients who underwent single- or double-layered unlocked closure of their uterine incision during their first cesarean delivery.
Methods: This study was conducted as a prospective cross-sectional study between February 2015 and January 2016 in patients admitted to the labour ward of the Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital who subsequently underwent their first delivery by cesarean section. Patients with a previous history of cesarean delivery, preterm pregnancies less than 34 gestational weeks, patients lost to follow-up or those who had an IUD inserted after delivery were excluded from the study. Out of the 327 patients who underwent primary cesarean delivery, 280 were included into the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the single- (n:126) or double-layered (n:156) closure of their uterine incision. The maternal age, height, weight, obstetric and gynecologic histories, medical histories, indications for their cesarean delivery, technique of uterine closure, birth weight of the baby, duration of the cesarean delivery, need for extra suturing and transfusion were recorded. A Saline infusion sonography (SIS) was performed 3 months postoperatively to determine the presence, depth and length of the cesarean scar. The residual myometrial thickness overlying the scar defect and the fundal myometrial thickness were recorded.
Results: No difference was detected between the groups with respect to patient characteristics, whether the operation was elective or emergent, the type of anesthesia used, need for extra suturing, incidence of bladder injuries or uterine atony, need for blood transfusions, duration of labour or cervical dilatation and effacement between the two groups. No statistically significant difference was detected between the two groups with respect to the length and depth of the scar defect.
Conclusion: Single- or double-layered closure of the uterus does not seem to affect the size of the uterine scar defect detected on SIS 3 months following the first cesarean delivery.
Keywords: Cesarean delivery; Saline infusion sonography; Scar defect; Uterine closure techniques; Uterine niche.
Similar articles
-
Impact of purse-string uterine suture on scar healing after a cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Jul;5(7):100992. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100992. Epub 2023 Apr 29. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023. PMID: 37127211 Clinical Trial.
-
Hysterotomy level at Cesarean section and occurrence of large scar defects: a randomized single-blind trial.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;53(4):438-442. doi: 10.1002/uog.20184. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30484920 Clinical Trial.
-
Longitudinal transvaginal ultrasound evaluation of cesarean scar niche incidence and depth in the first two years after single- or double-layer uterotomy closure: a randomized controlled trial.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Dec;96(12):1484-1489. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13213. Epub 2017 Sep 21. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017. PMID: 28832909 Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of Hysterotomy Closure Technique on Subsequent Cesarean Scar Defects Formation: A Systematic Review.Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2023;88(2):81-90. doi: 10.1159/000528144. Epub 2023 Feb 1. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2023. PMID: 36724750
-
Ultrasound outcomes and surgical parameters of the double-layer purse-string uterine closure technique in cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.BMC Surg. 2025 Feb 8;25(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02796-x. BMC Surg. 2025. PMID: 39923041 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Horizontal mattress uterine closure compared to single layered lock suture in cesarean section - A retrospective cohort study.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2023 Sep 3;20:100234. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100234. eCollection 2023 Dec. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2023. PMID: 37701631 Free PMC article.
-
Predictive value of abdominal wall scar score for pelvic floor function rehabilitation, vaginal microecology and complications after cesarean section.PeerJ. 2023 Sep 15;11:e16012. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16012. eCollection 2023. PeerJ. 2023. PMID: 37727692 Free PMC article.
-
Ranking of Risk Factors Leading to Uterine Scar Defect-Systematic Online Review.J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 26;14(13):4551. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134551. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40648925 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Construction and application of a prediction model for the delivery outcome of women with scarred uterus based on ultrasonic parameters.Am J Transl Res. 2023 Jan 15;15(1):264-272. eCollection 2023. Am J Transl Res. 2023. PMID: 36777867 Free PMC article.
-
Intra-operative Guidelines for the Prevention of Uterine Niche Formation in Cesarean Sections: A Review.Cureus. 2023 Sep 1;15(9):e44521. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44521. eCollection 2023 Sep. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37790067 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical